Val is a merchant mariner, one of the most noble professions I can think of. When he is not at sea, he works with his family as an apprentice electrician, in a wealthy area of a large city. Then, like most men who are men, he spends some time when he is not at sea hanging out with other men in gritty urban environments, and associating with friends from where he grew up.
The only problem for he and his friends is that they all grew up black-and in one of the biggest and most notorious urban ghetto’s that is a virtual powder keg of the toxins and effects of racism and the disparity of wealth. And, they grew up on a watchlist called the CalGang database, which literally monitors gangster babies from birth as if they are a threat to “organized society. And this database like so many others today which are hidden beyond the view of those who are catalogued in them-this database presumes criminality from birth. As such these men are literally and in every sense “targeted individuals.”
As you have probably guessed by now, Val is black. Such is the power of stereotypes, but also the power of language used in propaganda-most western people believe that blacks are the primary residents of ghetto’s ( an out dated term in itself, as “the hood” is used by ghetto dwellers all around the world due to Hip Hop music.) And as such, Val hangs out with other black people. And unlike Jewish ghetto’s of earlier era’s, these men are not self segregated.
” I hang out there when I am not at sea, because it’s my way of giving back, and trying to let them know there’s more than that-living there.”
What Val is saying is that he was fortunate, and that he “got out,” of the enforced entrapment and containment scheme that American ghetto’s are-and that in order to inspire others, he feels he has a duty to go back and “associate” with those who are “still there.” And it is this which made him a target of recruitment for gang stalking; and a possible “threat” in the matrix should he not comply with community policing.
Then, there is a little known fact that black American’s who police their own neighborhoods are tracked, targeted and assassinated for doing so, as we saw in the 1960’s with Black Panthers and others, and even today; whereas Jews have their own police in the Bronx and other places. In fact, in western nations, only Jews are allowed to police “their own.” SO certainly, we must ask who it is that enforces racial barriers, as well as polices speech, and association around these topics.
While association isn’t illegal yet in western countries, in the paradigm of OGS, association becomes a de facto reason whereby police power can entrap and recruit others into the “community policing scheme.” As anyone who has watched the last few decades, change comes very slowly, if at all, and even then, it is mediated by police power, which acts as a gatekeeper between what is “good,” and what is “bad,”- but all of THAT takes place in the many gray area community policing schemes. Good and evil then, are mediated in the internecine battle ground of hidden strife between police power, and “we the people” in a hidden battleground where every day rights and liberties are pphrased-for some, but not all- as “privileges and immunities” or as “necessary compromises.”
Val’s story of being recruited into community policing
” I was back one time, and all of a sudden they swept up on us. We were in a pretty large group, mostly a bunch of guys just hanging out. They put us up on the wall- you know, spread your legs, keep your hands out of your pockets, like that. I had no problem with it really, you get used to it(….) and I complied. Then, after they went through all of our pockets like that the usual stuff(…), they had a job to do (….).”
“So I told them about my service, and he was kind of, you know, surprised, and he took me into his SUV. He was the watch commander- four stripes…and one loop. He asked me why I was hanging around these guys, and I told him what I just told you-because I believe that the only way to make a difference is to come back here, and, you know, show thee guys that there’s something else. He left me his card, and told me to call, you know if you see something and all that. I stilll have his card on my dashboard.”
What Val is describing is the gray area between our Constitutional rights of assembly and rights of association, and the paradox that gray area has produced for exploitation of “the little guy’s” while corporate interests ranging from Peter Thiel’s conspiracy with Google and Palantir, to psychologies reliance on drug comany definitions of mental health. For some, obviously, torture is ok, as lng as it’s the “bad guys” getting water up there nose, or a few “dangerous mentally ill people” popping a few fix-society-by-drugging-you pills when they complain about being “stalked” or “hunted” or otherwise ham stringed and black bagged by gray area policing schemes.
So, for some policing is purely profitable, but for most, the community policing scheme has produced an opposite effect on our society, and on our liberty, that is itself a civil conspiracy by those in power to force the police to become abusers of the Constitution itself.
Due to the lifting of the Constitutional guarantees of rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” via the un-Constitutional gray area policing scheme of organized gang stalking, aka community policing, and the full blown assault on our rights of privacy, speech, press, assembly, and every single other right that can be inferred from the right of privacy not yet enumerated-we see that a vast encroachment on our rights to “freedom of association” are crimped at the internet switch, or our telephones, and thereafter. So, yes, this can have a disparate effect on select people, not least of which is to with draw from society that “perpetrates” such day to day abuses.
So- I would like to re-examine a main thesis of Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, two academics whose lives have been lived in academia-which is a major social disease of our times, and which can lead to an echo chamber effect within researchers who have spent NO time in the real world. In fact, their famous study on OGS interviewed “the internet.” take a moment to let that sink in. Then, nte that the term “gang stalking” is termed “group stalking” because those who wrote the study are practicing what amounts to a form of “gas lighting.” This happens because of the social disconnect between the modern transhumanists and actual, real people from across the spectrum. And not insignificantly, academics notoriously live and dwel in “ivory towers,” which Emil Durkheim discussed when he coined the term “anomie.”
For my purposes, I will note that ivory towers, and the incredible amounts of MIC and AIPAC money consumed by academics, can nearly eradicate human conscience, and any sense of ethics, much less insight into issues as complex as OGS as the fat of the trough swells their eyes shut. Here below is the definition of “anomie,” and some discussion of it next to a summary of the Sheridan James study-and it MUST be noted that those who are “suffering” OGS are being referred BACK INTO THE POLICING SCHEME by Sheridan and James:
an·o·mie
ˈanəˌmē/
noun
noun: anomie; noun: anomy
-
lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.
“the theory that high-rise architecture leads to anomie in the residents”
And here is the summary of Sheridan and James analyses of OGS as a likely “delusional disorder:”
Group-stalking appears to be delusional in basis, but complainants suffer marked psychological and practical sequelae. This is important in assessment of risk in stalking cases, early referral to psychiatric services and allocation of police resources.
So, Val, who I talked with this morning, reported an attempt to recruit him into the community policing scheme, by a “gang strike force” and offered the hint that cooperation with this as a “normative” duty of his citizenship was expected. Val is neither delusional, nor is he suffering trauma, because unlike others in his peer group, he had a father, he respects his fathers authority, and that father was also a world traveler. His father, as opposed to many others
who got swept into high heels policing, such as this example here, encouraged individuality within “normative” association.
And, he imparted to Val a desire to “get out and see the world,” which he did. In doing so, Val, unlike his peer group, Val learned about the “hierarchy of relationships,” and probably a thing or two about kyriarchical paradigms, though he didn’t elaborate it as such. Instead, he had a grasp on what iis anomie, and he tries to make a difference, realizing that “all things are NOT created equal.”
It was popularized by French sociologist
Émile Durkheim in his influential book
Suicide (1897). Durkheim never uses the term
normlessness; rather, he describes anomie as “derangement”, and “an insatiable will”.
[3] Durkheim used the term “the malady of the infinite” because desire without limit can never be fulfilled; it only becomes more intense.
Durkheim, who used the concept to speak of the ways in which an individual’s actions are matched, or integrated, with a system of social norms and practices… anomie is a mismatch, not simply the absence of norms.
I have discussed anomie and organized gang stalking in terms of gang stalking being an unethical, illicit and illegal practice that psychology, and policing and the hidden networks of abusive social power that are wielded by “community policing” and NGO’s and other’s who participate in it, and yet because there is an absence of “norms” or even awareness, and worse, that in a society where power is the goal, that “norms” themselves are unhealthy; as do the methods of enforcing them, and that inequitably.
Academia is ill suited to deal with OGS in any substantive way- and I suggest it is because they are socially disconnected themselves- that they embody the worst that Durkheim could have imagined. And, it is not surprising that in Durkheim’s anomie, and our current pervasive police and surveillance state, that in:
a society with too much rigidity and little individual discretion could also produce a kind of anomie… Thus, fatalistic suicide arises when a person is too rule-governed
Note that in anomie, suicide is a possible outcome, and in fact was the subject f Durkheim’s analyses- and in the OGS dialectic, there is nearly a constant drum beat for victims to do exactly that.
This is not incidental- it is an integral component of the eugenic nature inherent to the entire dialectic, and as such, and in the case of Val, who “got out” we see the disparate police power attempting to enlist him in the aid of becoming a rat, rather than an individual attempting to make a difference by merely setting a good example as an accomplished individual. That he is being subtly encouraged to become an informer as a first step into a wider dialectical power base, and thus, recruited into the gray area.
So, of the many things that this one example provides, I cannot tell you if Val was stalked in a database before the event he describes. I cannot tell you if Dataminr, Palantir, Media Sonar, or any of the many other ways that our relationships are tracked and monitored by police and others every day were deployed on him.
But I can tell you with scientific certainty that he was profiled; targeted; and an attempt was made to recruit him to become an informant in his community. And with certainty, I can ell you that this all happened in a highly targeted environment, whose future has been mapped frequently from birth.
Gang Stalking is "community policing" aka "communist policing," and it poses a threat to Democracy and public safety 