The enemy of organized gang stalkers is an unique suspect: “individualism.” How Heng Choon Chan, and Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, are schtupping us with Hegellian phalluses.

So, up until now, we have seen many many examples of how gang stalking is related to policing, and community policing, aka “communitarian” policing, and how there are racial, class, gendered elements that conspire to phrase “the other” as mentally ill, rather than as persons needing protection that is guaranteed to them by due process rights, but which is more often than not denied to TI’s in ‘official source gas lighting’ campaigns, as may TI’s report this exact fact.

And, we have seen how the MSM has so far played along with this odd and dishonest narrative, literally framing the dialectic as that of dangerous crazy people versus “everyone else.” So it cannot be overlooked that this is an extension of psychology as a pseudo science, directly and LITERALLY related to Edward Bernay’s and “mind control.”

So now we must take a look at the type of material that Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, as well as other DVIC profiteers use to “organize” their version of a society. And the key here, it will be noted, is that these same are at war with “individuals.”

Here, from Heng Choon Chan and Lorraine Sheridan, we see another clear indicator that “individuality” is an issue, as many “targeted individuals” will tell you, but also, that these researchers are deliberately pairing the individual against the collective-and remember, that in the Hegelian Dialectic, constant conflict is a purely profitable model for some individuals, at the expense of many others who are targeted by them. In the case I am about to introduce, we see a comparison between a communist countries perceptions of stalking contrasted (conflicted) with western individualist perceptions.

And before I introduce the link between stalking and attacks on individuality-and many of those attacks BY the exact academics that believe in the collective-I would first like to point the reader to Sheridan’s following online, which clearly indicates two things: 1) she is closely affiliated with police and the DVIC, as well as the many newly emerged groups of organized gang stalkers that I have implicated elsewhere on this blog, and 2) her work in prisons is nearly as inhumane and antithetical to the lived experience of an actual target of organized stalking, Dr. Moss David Posner, who died as a TI while advocating for  prisoners rights.

Then, I would like to point the researcher to the fact that much of Sheridan and James-et al’s work-indeed the entire dialectic of who or what is stalking or stalkers  is also very closely centered on police and police perception management, and “influence:”Are police under the influence of influence operations by pseudo-science and psychology?

And here we see the “conflict” begin:

Organized gang stalking and conspiracy theory psychology

Meet Dr. Michael Wood, who writes  thoughtful academic analyses about conspiracy theories. In a sea of conspiracy theorists and government disinformation agents, Dr. Wood is a rare, and respectable opinion as regards the “what is” of organized gang stalking. But he is incorrect in relegating it to the realm of mental illness, as much of the actual research demonstrates that organized stalking occurs and is under-reported, but also, because law enforcement collaborates with other institutions to perpetrate it, it remains hidden (here, here, here, here, and here).

Dr Michael Wood, Lecturer in Psychology

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Dr Michael Wood
Email:
Phone:
+44 (0)1962 826390
Address:

The University of Winchester
Sparkford Road
Winchester SO22 4NR
UK

Like Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, who has been widely discredited in the online community of targeted individuals, Dr. Wood seems to suffer from bouts of academia, and spells of full spectrum propaganda absorption but once you get past that, he seems to be one of the few rational minds out there who has addressed this topic of research, and he is clearly NOT one of the many CIA, NSA or other alphabet affiliated misinformation specialists with a “Dr.” before their name such as Dr. Robert Duncan, et al, who are as much informative as they are dangerous in the dialectic of gang stalking, as they are actively involved with mind control.

 

From Dr. Wood’s blog (which analyzes conspiracy theories from the perspective of a psychology lecturer).

The psychology of gang stalking, and the difference between conspiracy theory and delusion

If you’ve spent enough time on the Internet (or read the New York Times yesterday), you might have come across the phenomenon of gang stalking – the alleged stalking of particular individuals by organized groups. It might seem like gang stalking is a sort of conspiracy theory, and that we can maybe understand it in the same way that we think about things like the 9/11 Truth Movement and beliefs in UFO coverups. I’m not sure about this. There are some pretty major psychological differences between the two. It’s probably not helpful to conflate run-of-the-mill conspiracy theories, which are not considered to be an indicator of psychopathology, with gang stalking, which is widely considered to be the product of delusional thinking.

….follow the link to learn more.

Dr. Wood is a rare breath of fresh air in the smog that most gang stalking blogs are, and he has a solid background to interpret the data. However, as I stated above, he is also an academic with limited world experience, and as  a psychologist, he is clinically trained to avoid the schizophrenic narrative, and the pitfalls of personal narratives, which I have always found to be one of the most interesting failings of psychology, because as much as it is expedient to put people into categories and boxes with labels, schizophrenia is one of the most mis-diagnosed of all mental illnesses.

Then, there is the Martha Mitchell effect, whereby people who describe real life experiences to psychiatrists get diagnosed as nutters, when in fact, they are often whistle blowers, and others with counter-narratives that challenge the powerful. Martha  Mitchell famously told her shrink that the Nixon White House was corrupt, then, she was mis-diagnosed, and some have speculated that she was a victim of punitive psychology.

In the case of Dr. Wood’s analyses, he falls short as most of these pundits and bloggers do, because he simply does not appear to have had a life outside of academia long enough to get a glimpse of the real world.

And most interestingly, his work linked above, came out around the same time as the United States government and the British liberals were attacking “fake news,” and decrying all of the conspiracy theories that harmed their pet causes- “All men are rapists-but Bill Clinton is NOT a RAPIST!; while promulgating conspiracy theories of their own ( It was the RUSSIANS! They raped all dese’ emails and dese elections!).

There was a huge push in June of 2016 to discredit those who were experiencing an increase in political gang stalking, sponsored by neocon liberals and academics. In his work he cites one of the most widely discredited narratives ever written about organized gang stalking: the Mike McPhate hit piece that cites Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, a psychological specialist whose work indicates that she sees male sexuality as deviant, and the article which carries one of the most pathetic propaganda poster children for gang stalking ever-Timothy Trespas.

All in all, it’s hard to tell if Dr. Woods politics have clouded his vision, or if his academic training has clouded his ability to discern propaganda from real cases of real people who have been staked and abused. And I am not saying his politics are anything radical or even that I can define, but I can say with certainty that academia leans left, and also has the selective blinders of the AIPAC and other Israel forever war lobbies clouding their vision.

But my best guess is that his approach is the wrong one-for now, and Martha Mitchell is in full effect, and like it or not, academia is a huge cult.And certainly, academia is immune to the concept of “do no harm,” as pertains to propaganda.

On a bright note, he is quite well published, and his opinions appear open to dialogue. I suggest you follow the link above and read more.

 

 

 

Organized gang stalking, psychological and influence operations.

A large part of what the organized gang stalking dialectic seems to be is the result of psychological operations, and influence by suggestion. And some 70% of the blogs I have read talk about something called “electronic no touch torture,” which in my mind at least, is an accurate description of how one feels after their privacy is invaded, and or they are subjected to contact with agency level psychological operations. Every agency has a dirty tricks section, and they use them covertly, and judges and juries much less the average citizen are never aware they were there.

Even the world reknowned authorities David V. James and Lorraine Sheridan on OGS agree that the mysterious and nebulous “the internet” creates an “ideological echo chamber,” i.e. that for some, the targeted advertisements, the targeted switches and targeted routers i targeted American communities who have ISP’s that target words, and CEO’s that target speakers, and community policing that trickles in from the internet switch- and for targeted individualsThe internet creates a sort of ‘closed ideology echo chamber’ wherein people who share unusual beliefs reinforce each other’s thinking”

Which is, or course, by systemic design as we see the redirection method being used by “mystery money” funded startups to influence “jihadists” and the equally nebulous “right wing” alike via linguistic analyses, which is known as “persuasion,” and also “soft force mind control, and more. Then there is the direct access to any given targets mind via hacked cell phones, and then, hacked relationships-because that is EXACTLY what the Panopticon was designed to do.

Most sites and discussions about no touch torture are loaded at the front end and are themselves psychological operations. Butt of the few sites that are not, we see that it is a real concept, and practice.

Psychotherapist Otto Doerr-Zegers, who has treated Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet stated; “The psychological component of torture becomes a kind of total theater, a constructed unreality of lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably with the victim’s self-betrayal and destruction. …”

This is similar to the technique of “street theater” that mind control victims described in the Washington Post Magazine article. As torture victims are not mentally ill, mind control victims would not be mentally ill but rather have undergone and are undergoing a traumatic situation comparable to torture, such as the alleged illegal targeting with government mind control weapons.

Here below, is one of the ways it is deployed in the real world, from NBC news, is Britain’s JTRIG dirty tricks division:

“British spies have developed “dirty tricks” for use against nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers that include releasing computer viruses, spying on journalists and diplomats, jamming phones and computers, and using sex to lure targets into “honey traps.”

Imagine yourself sitting down to write an email, and all of a sudden your connection is cut. Then, you look in the body of your email and that masterpiece that you spent some 10 minutes writing to your aunt Alice has also and without explanation, disappeared-and NO COPY EXISTS in you drafts folder.

The first time this happens to you, you would be pissed-but if it happened dozens of times as you write critical stuff-emails to your doctor, a hot tip to your bookie(*jk*), or an even hotter tip to a journalist who believes in Constitutional liberty, you would begin to see patterns in your own mind-that your data is being messed with inside you.And, in fact, the internet has literally come into your home, and changed your behavior even before your fingers hit the keyboard-and altered your actions inside you.

This is what no touch electronic torture really is in real world deployment. And while it may seem insignificant, it has the cumulative effect over time of wearing a person down, letting them know that they are being watched, and that crucial and critical communications are being stopped at one’s fingertips. Important friends and associations are being destroyed each time you bring up these “odd happenings.”

And this, combined with other electronic no touch torture: your computer is hacked repeatedly, or flashing white screens; your cell phone apps turning your phone on and off seemingly at will, or the coincidental amplification of your conversation in your ear. here are literally hundreds of ways that a persons phone can be messed with, and TI’s talk about that too. Taken as a broader picture, it is the cumulative effect that does the damage.

Torture in any form is abhorrent, and never necessary, despite the claims of those who torture, who also happen to be the same people who have collected all of our internet data and are now culling through it  with 17 other agencies for blackmail purposes. If I had told you this is what is happening even five years ago, you would have called me a nutter. And now, I bet, even you are afraid to say it out loud much less do anything about it. First they came for the crazy guy on the internet….

Using neuro-linguistic programming techniques as simple as Google auto search”suggestion,” and subtle verbal intimidation, as well as the deployment of various internet tricks, such as cutting off a persons ability to write blogs, or the interception of emails, much of what we see can be said to have the hallmarks of classic operant conditioning, combined with learned helplessness.

This last link is important because many in the dialectic feel as though they will never be able to overcome their situation. And, the one venue they have, the internet, is subverted at every point as heir blogs get hacked, and their emails intercepted, and so on. Some 50% or more of the hundreds of blogs I have read indicate that these things happen. So it could be an indicator that there is something afoot, as other online communities of bloggers do not report these things, dwell on them, or even infer that they happen.

So, even a casual investigator of this community will readily recognize this feature. And, there appear to be some blogs that use learned helplessness language, and others that d not. Simple phrases like oh, targets, just get used to it, Wherever we go, there will always be gang stalkers,” and so on. A great example of that is the blog https://neverending1.wordpress.com, where the writer never loses the chance to use negative language that reinforces the hopelessness of those who go here for advice.( I refuse to provide a link it is that negative.)

Extra Bonus: Here is the CIA page for psychological operations to control populations.

Sigmund Freud, in “Civilization and its Discontents,” notoriously classified modern men as “men of action,” and the intelligence agencies are really into that.

“The man who is predominantly erotic will give first preference to his emotional relationships to other people; the narcissistic man, who inclines to be self-sufficient, will seek his main satisfactions in his internal mental processes; the man of action will never give up the external world on which he can try out his strength….”

-Sigmund Freud

And, in the targeted individual community, there is no small irony that they begin to refer to themselves as “TI’s” when in fact the PsyWar equivalent is the “TA” meaning targeted audience.

Here from the CIA link above:

The intelligence officer is not inspired by the purpose of merely collecting and evaluating information or making analytic studies. His mission is not an end in itself, but a means to an end — a contribution to the defense and foreign policy objectives of his country. His work is therefore meaningful only to the extent that the information he provides is utilized through appropriate action. The individual operator’s performance, to be sure, does not lose merit if significant information which he acquired in due time and reported to proper authority is not acted upon; but the intelligence organization as a whole has failed to function effectively if the information it produces does not lead to some kind of policy determination or action.

I must at this juncture make note that in classic schizophrenia, there has always been the element that these claim that they are being followed or harassed by the CIA or the FBI. While organized gang stalking DOES have these claims within it, sometimes, even the paranoids are right, as we se now with the Palantir database which is equipped with artificial intelligence an predictive software, as well as a host of other means by which to ‘read a person’s mind’ and control or manipulate their online behaviors.

But it’s simply not fair to blame the CIA for everything, although it is convenient, and the idea is within the vernacular of most people.Since Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA is sweeping up the data of everyone, and all Americans as well, we are now able to track the basic flow of this data in news stories that document the reach of this grand psychological operation we see that the picture is much bigger, in much more horrible ways than the CIA could imagine all by its lonesome.

Here in this link are the tactics and techniques of guiding, misguiding, or poisoning the dialectic entirely, and then, disguising victims in the cloak of mental illness.Any researcher of organized gang stalking will find correlations between the phhrase “electronic harassment” and discrediting tactics outlined in the CIA manual. In the targeted individual community, the psy-war elements are everywhere.

The Five Eyes nations are all in on it, and Great Britain is one of the worst offenders, using the dirty tricks division JTRIG to compromise, blackmail, and discredit targeted individuals.

A slide from the JTRIG dirty tricks and mind control presentation. Note the emphasis of “making something happen in the real world.” Mass shooters anyone? What else are these guys “making to happen?”via The Intercept

Israel has been getting ALL Americans data since forever, and waging hasbara and other psyops across the globe to enforce, reinforce, or otherwise promote Jewish religion and culture (the apartheid, mind control, old lady killing zionist version  of it.)

From the Washington Post:

“The relationship was described in a “Memorandum of Understanding” between the NSA and the Israeli SIGINT National Unit (ISNU)”

So- if those are “our friends”-our enemies must be real shitbags right?  But even China has yet to catch up with us as comes to waging active psy-war on it’s citizens. We can read  CNN as they try to downplay the fact that China is doing EXACTLY what the Five Eyes alliance is doing to suppress, control, discredit and destroy the free speech rights of western nations.Meet the CNN  version of “the Great Cannon of China.”

But-does it hold up well against the Free Speech Steamroller that we use? Only time will tell-or, maybe someone can  get standing to sue our agencies and see what they are really up to. I bet the Chinese are rolling in laughter as they watch how the agencies and law enforcement in general are using our Constitution as toilet paper.

Lastly, it cannot be understated that “the CIA tortured some folks.” And that the American Psychiatry Association provided advice as to how to do this. Meanwhile, their guys always get the help they need when they are done torturing others. I don’t mean to imply that the CIA and other’s are using the internet as a form of torture for some, but YES THAT IS WHAT I AM IMPLYING. But clearly, they aren’t the only ones doing it.

Mao has nothing on our guys when it comes to propaganda, and mind control techniques, and China last I checked had no Manchurian Candidates.