Epilepsy warning: this post contains a swirling graphic image
While our governments, our corporations, and our intelligence and law enforcement agencies believe it is their right to steal our data, and use it to maniulate and even abuse certain people and to wage influence operations on us, in secret, I believe in fair warning, in anticipation of un-intended consequences, hence my epilepsy warning above. This is the difference between consensual behavior, and non-consensual behavior, and the NSA/CIA/FBI/DEA data theft pipeline had 15 year head start on all of us.
Except, me, maybe.
Any cursory research into organized gang stalking reveals that politics are a major factor in “who gets targeted with OGS.” While there are varying levels of targeting, ranging from simple “influence” operations through the internet, to extreme cases where local politicians and others gang up on individuals to harass, intimidate, or otherwise coerce them, the most common “targeting” that individuals face is through advertising.
As we saw in the caase of “Moonshot CVE” and in the cases of Twitter monitoring activists and feeding the data to law enforcement and other un-named parties, and programs like DataminR and Media Sonar being used concurrently at Fusion Centers, and the local police department, as well as yet un-named intelligence agency level programs, there is a constant blurring of lines between advertisers, governments, political PAC’s corporations, and then, police and intelligence agencies targeting of activists and others in spying or conformity enforcement operations.
WElcome to PsyOps, and mind control, and “influence by constant suggestion.. Or, this:
So, to put this in common terms, imagine yourself walking down the sidewalk, dodging blots of chewing gum, and the residue of mop water dumped across your path. These are ordinary pedestrian obstacles, and most people expect some of that when out walking.
As you continue on your path, all of a sudden, a bicyclist heads straight towards you, so fast that they seem as if they might just run you over. What do you do? Of course, you step aside, thinking-“what a rude prick. I had the right of way- and bicycles are supposed to ride on the street!”
You brush it off, and continue on your path. An the obstacles become more and more: the couple walking along is as wide as the sidewalk, and you step off into the grass to let them pass. And then, five teenagers on skateboards; and then, at a crosswalk, people are bumping into you from all directions as if you are not there.
These scenarios above are what is described by TI’s who are being gang stalked, and particularly in the last example, this is what is known as “community mbbing,” and also “street theater.” TI’s write endlessly about this online, but they are also described by others who “suffer delusional disorders.” What’s the main difference? Proof- proof is required to indicate that such is actual, real, and happening to you.
In OGS, proof is hard to get, because of the design of community harassment and community policing, but online, it is easier to prove, now that we know with certainty that it IS happening, it IS targeted, and it IS political. And, as we see above, it IS attempting to influence you, your behavior, and your choices.
Here, below, from Breitbart News, we see targeted individuals as swing voters, but we also see that language and particularly, coded and slanderous language is used to label, and further harass or otherwise cause harm to individuals who don’t toe a party line.
While on the surface, it cannot be missed that this targeted “outreach” is yet another example of Democrat demagoguery, it also cannot be missed that “hetero-normative white people” are being labeled in ways that can and do trigger the Department of Homeland Security “threat matrix” and “bad words” lists, as “white supremacists are on every list as “hate groups”:
NH Dem Party Chair Calls Rural, Disaffected Voters ‘White Supremacists’
This weekend WMUR’s “CloseUp” interviewed the executive director of “Look Ahead America” Matt Braynard, whose new organization is planning outreach to inactive voters in New Hampshire.
Braynard said, “We’ve identified maybe 15,000 inactive voters who we would consider disaffected, patriotic Americans. And potentially 100,000 or more unregistered adults we’re going to reach out to.”
He explained his organization was using “psychometrics,” saying, “Normally it gets applied to likely voters universes for purposes of persuasion. We are applying it towards identifying patriotic Americans who’ve become disaffected and cynical, so we can engage them on issues relevant to them, get them registered, get them educated and turn them out to vote.”
In response, the chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party Ray Buckley said, “The organizing and activating of these extremists, these white supremacists, really could have a detrimental effect on the entire culture of New Hampshire.”
In the aricle above, note the use of the word “psychometrics” which literally means ” the measure of psychological effects in order to cause persuasion.” This is not insignificant, as we see that “influence” is the goal, and that “psychology” is applied as a tool.
In relatively harmless incidents such as this, we must ask ourselves if “influence operations” are harmful, and most likely come up with the answer that they are mildly intrusive, but not necessarily “causing harm.”
However, in these cases, when we add the fact that the data used is derived from the “profiles” that our own ISP’s have sold to outside organizations; and that these profiles are shared and re-sold across gvernment, private industry, political PAC’s, the Five Eyes Alliance, and even in the case of Israel, that our profiles are literally given to a theocratic, apartheid nation state that has not signed any nuclear treaty or even officially disclosed that it is a nuclear power the story of harm versus “no harm” becomes a question that few are willing to ask out loud; being used against their and it becomes a question where the individual this targeted must make a stand, or simply succumb to being used against their free will in such a manner.
So, this issue of “supremacy” becomes for some of us, a crucial and key point wherein we must ask “whose white supremacy” is being targeted and whose white supremacy is not (most Israeli’s and other supremacist Jews still encourage their daughters to marry only white men). And certainly, other theocratic, nationalistic, racial, and psychological supremacy becomes part of each persons targeting as well. So-whose decisions are we actually making when we are under chronic and constant “influence operations”?
Regardless of the answer, there is one other level of questionable targeting: the fact that beyond advertisers profiling us, we also have intelligence agencies profiling us, and then, targeting us as well, individually n levels that only nazi maad scientists were able to conceive of in decades past.
Because the past is the present is the future with intelligence agencies, we know with certainty that other, more nefarious and unethical targeting takes place, and that this takes place in secret, without our informed consent- that this entire internet entrapment scheme that has made everyone a target, has now morphed into a wider scheme of political targeting on the ‘consumer’ level; and that despite the consumer’s awareness that it is them, being consumed first, and targeted advertising only after that.
So beyond the citizens rights to protest or even to withdraw from these big data schemes, or the use of our data to make us targets, multiple levels of targeting are taking place at all times, and our decisions are under constant and chronic attack.
Gang Stalking is "community policing" aka "communist policing," and it poses a threat to Democracy and public safety 