The enemy of organized gang stalkers is an unique suspect: “individualism.” How Heng Choon Chan, and Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, are schtupping us with Hegellian phalluses.

So, up until now, we have seen many many examples of how gang stalking is related to policing, and community policing, aka “communitarian” policing, and how there are racial, class, gendered elements that conspire to phrase “the other” as mentally ill, rather than as persons needing protection that is guaranteed to them by due process rights, but which is more often than not denied to TI’s in ‘official source gas lighting’ campaigns, as may TI’s report this exact fact.

And, we have seen how the MSM has so far played along with this odd and dishonest narrative, literally framing the dialectic as that of dangerous crazy people versus “everyone else.” So it cannot be overlooked that this is an extension of psychology as a pseudo science, directly and LITERALLY related to Edward Bernay’s and “mind control.”

So now we must take a look at the type of material that Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, as well as other DVIC profiteers use to “organize” their version of a society. And the key here, it will be noted, is that these same are at war with “individuals.”

Here, from Heng Choon Chan and Lorraine Sheridan, we see another clear indicator that “individuality” is an issue, as many “targeted individuals” will tell you, but also, that these researchers are deliberately pairing the individual against the collective-and remember, that in the Hegelian Dialectic, constant conflict is a purely profitable model for some individuals, at the expense of many others who are targeted by them. In the case I am about to introduce, we see a comparison between a communist countries perceptions of stalking contrasted (conflicted) with western individualist perceptions.

And before I introduce the link between stalking and attacks on individuality-and many of those attacks BY the exact academics that believe in the collective-I would first like to point the reader to Sheridan’s following online, which clearly indicates two things: 1) she is closely affiliated with police and the DVIC, as well as the many newly emerged groups of organized gang stalkers that I have implicated elsewhere on this blog, and 2) her work in prisons is nearly as inhumane and antithetical to the lived experience of an actual target of organized stalking, Dr. Moss David Posner, who died as a TI while advocating for  prisoners rights.

Then, I would like to point the researcher to the fact that much of Sheridan and James-et al’s work-indeed the entire dialectic of who or what is stalking or stalkers  is also very closely centered on police and police perception management, and “influence:”Are police under the influence of influence operations by pseudo-science and psychology?

And here we see the “conflict” begin:

Is This Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking Behavior Among Young Male and Female Adults in Hong Kong and Mainland China

Heng Choon (Oliver) Chan, PhD, Lorraine Sheridan, PhD

First Published May 29, 2017 Research Article

Download PDF

Article information

Abstract

Most studies of stalking are conducted with samples from individualist cultures. Little is known about the phenomenon within collectivist cultures. The present study is arguably the first stalking study conducted in Hong Kong. Specifically, this study investigates a large sample of Asian college students’ (N = 2,496) perceptions of stalking behavior, potential reasons for stalking, and coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims. Associations between these variables and gender and culture (Hong Kong vs. Mainland China) were also explored. Gender was more strongly associated with perceptions of stalking behavior than was culture. Gender was less strongly associated with perceptions concerning motivations for stalking and the effectiveness of coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims than was culture.

….follow this link to read more

Feminism, safe spaces, cry bullies and organized gang stalking: the case of the Rwandan Genocide and ’empowered women.’

The Rwandan Genocide was a “women’s war.”

While much of the research on organized gang stalking indicates a police element run amok as it works with the “community policing scheme” that favors the lop-sided narrative of violence, and then, shelters the worst elements of criminality in the heart of what is left of the American home: woen’s violence. Why is that?

Women’s violence is covert, networked, and slanderous;  dangerous because of the pedadstalization of women BY women and the men they choose as co-conspirators – and also was behind what was called “The Red Guard” under Mao Tze Deng, or called “Red Squads” during the heyday of the FBI using the Ku Klux Klan and other social groups to terrorize “uppity negroes” and more as primarily white wmen wh had extensive power networked then as they do now to on one hand hide their influence, and on the other, to cry wolf, on que whenever they are challenged in their power-and then, their henchmen and wimmin step in to maintain narrative control.

Today, we see a similar element, working with different and ‘more diverse’ groups, to cause domestic terror in the form of the DVICWhat is the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex, and who pays for it?.  And despite he so-called “rise of the right” we know from history that most Nazi organizers were, or are gay Jewish men like Frank Collin, or quite frequently are FBI informants. So, while you can quit worrying about the Klan, you might want to examine these other lunatic fringes.

Without a doubt, we see that violent women use institutional forces to wage purely psychopathic campaigns. For instance, in the most recent genocide on record, women were instrumental in leading the charge that other women be raped; murdered, dismembered, and more.

Women as Leaders in GenocideWomen as Leaders in Genocide and the similarity between women’s actual violence, and women’s social or cultural violence

ISSN: 1558-8769

Volume 8, 2012-2013 › Essays, Studies, and Works ›

Women Leaders in the Rwandan Genocide: When Women Choose To Kill

Donna J. Maier

The role of women as perpetrators in the Rwanda Genocide has been documented much more so than that of women in other genocides and crimes against humanity: more than in the holocaust of World War II, than in the massacres of Mayan Guatemala’s Indians in 1982, and more even than in the widespread atrocities that accompanied the break-up of the former Yugoslavia which were virtually concurrent with the Rwanda Genocide. It is not entirely clear why this is the case. Testimonies of women perpetrators and victims were collected in the immediate aftermath of the Rwandan Genocide by various human rights groups, most completely by the United Kingdom based NGO African Rights which published its data within a year of the genocide.[1] More evidence has emerged in the trials of genocidaires at the International Criminal Tribunal forRwanda, and in trials in the national courts of Rwanda,Belgium, and other countries.  These trials include the evidence of female victims, but also have included prosecution of high level women perpetrators which have resulted in guilty verdicts.

In feminist circles, the co-option of social cause, and the essential destruction of any person’s individual narrative by globalist agenda’s takes place in ‘closed settings,’ aka ‘safe spaces’ as some seek to build a following, or enforce a cult mentality via closed door intimidation. The isolation factor cannot be lost on any in the ‘healing professions’ or law enforcement. And cry bullies, a recent scourge of those who practice identity politics-and who were resoundingly ousted from power in the election of 2016-are frequently the precursor to organized gang stalking.

And, OGS is an actual contagion on modern college campuses, as young women and others are brainwashed via hysterical trance formation to mouth words and act out scripts of trauma that seldom resemble the actual events they claim to have endured. Indeed, there are forms of female initiated violence that could use an updated profile on Fakerape.

Related Stories: How one young woman, Emma Sulkowicz virtually begged a young man for anal sex, and then, claimed he was her was a rapist when he didn’t submit to her other perverse means of control(nothing against experimental sex, butt….)

The UVA fakerape hoax was one piece of a larger bunch of asses, magnified around the world, thanks to the now fully discredited liar Sabrina Rubin Erdeley

Eight famous FakeRape’s

UVA fraternity that was defamed and libeled by Sabrina Rubin Erdeley’s fake rape story in Rolling Stone magazine settles for 1.65 million

Gang Stalkers: Minus 1.65 million We the People: plus 1.65 million

So-forget “fakerape” as an issue of merit and begin to see it as a nefarious ploy of those who are likely institutional sociopaths, psychopaths, and degenerates, such as Sabrina Rubin Erdeley and others who practice the lowliest form of activist journalism, called “lying their asses off” or a dollar or two. )

Then, begin to take note that some women are mercilessly gang stalked in academia-in numbers that are likely far greater than “fakerape’s” that are mediated in-you guessed it-as in the Sulkowicz case and the UVA rape hoaxes, these cases are mediated in academic settings and “closed door adjudication hearings” that have no legal standing, but can ruin a young boys academic career by slander.

And all of this in a climate of “safe spaces” where these terrorists and bullies plot their crimes, and then cry foul when they are discovered. And LEO’s for the most part just don’t care- they get paid no matter what. In fact, fake rape and other DVIC plts are helping to drain taxpayers, and break he countries bank.

So, in these cases of organized academic gang stalking, trauma can be presumed, as the stalkers and harassers all deploy a form of “trauma-bonding” that is written about in the literature of torture, and also, is part of the diagnoses of Stockholm Syndrome as we saw with the largest DNA exoneration in American history.

Here is a snapshot of Ms. Sulkowicz rape theater:

In recent months, Emma Sulkowicz, the Columbia University senior who carries her mattress around campus as a protest against the university’s non-expulsion of her alleged rapist (and an art project for her senior thesis) has been hailed as a heroine in the battle against campus sexual assault.

While Sheridan and James maintain that somehow, group stalking and gang stalking are dissimilar, one glance at the data tells us that it is nearly all the same. However, because they are ensconced in the “fake world” of academia, they seldom see the similarity-or deal with victims of this horrible practice. I myself have known one individual who committed suicide after extensive harassment in her master’s degree program.

From HER online, a discussion about organized gang stalking in academic and institutional settings:

Gang Stalking: Psychological Targeting in a Group Setting

By Rheyanne Weaver HERWriter

The average functioning individual does not have a lot to be logically paranoid about. Sure, there’s the occasional whisper that you overhear and think is about yourself. There’s also the fear that someone is following you. Then there is gang stalking.

This is the ultimate form of paranoia that turns out to be a well-founded suspicion and mistrust. Gang stalking is when a group of people decide to target an individual and attempt to control aspects of that individual’s life and monitor them 24/7. Generally, this is done without the person actually knowing about this organized stalking group, but if a person does find out, the results and helplessness can be devastating.

According to gangstalkingworld.com, “gang stalking is experienced as a covert psychological, emotional and physical attack, that is capable of immobilizing and destroying a target over time.”

Sound sick yet? It gets worse. Targets are chosen for many reasons, including dissenting opinions in politics and the workplace. The overall goal is to break the targets down, from making them just look crazy for suspecting gang stalking to isolating them to ruining their reputation and credibility to forcing them to commit suicide.

People might participate in gang stalking without knowing these horrible consequences. They might gang stalk to be accepted into a group or be forced into gang stalking.

The Brush pass: what is ‘directed conversation’ in the OGS dialectic?

Those refreshing interludes.

“Every time we are sent down to Mexico to train one group in SWAT tactics, we know they’ll be sending us down there in ten years to kill the same guys we are training today.” and “It used to be that the Israeli’s came here to train, and now we go over there.”

–spoken to me by an anonymous retired SWAT lieutenant just this afternoon 08-15-2017

While on  the surface, my writings may seem to some to be provocative-which is what all respectable words SHOULD be-a certain group of ‘umbrella’ organizations and their adherents in and outside of policing and its affiliated brethren and sisterns might feel that my writings herein are “anti-police, or even “anti-government,” based on their political leanings, or payola.

I wish to point out the that nothing is further from the truth as pertains to my intentions, or more important than free speech regarding this topic, and that, unfettered by political compromises, or the silencing that can happen through the great blackmail scheme that we have come to learn is the NSA data collection scheme and its accompanying database abuse; and that due process is the first step and the last step one will ever take in America, and know with great pride that they are fortunate to live here, and interact here, as citizens. This is, I would like to remind my 26 readers from today, a right, and NOT a privilege.

One of the biggest problems facing American’s today is the same problem that is facing policing, which is that of defining the “us” from the “them.” This has and always been a problem in policing of any kind. When speaking of “us versus them,” it is important to look at the roots of this dual and dichotomous narrative, but also ask if “the right people” are the ones being targeted. Then, it is important to know that targeting via database operations has taken on nightmarish proportions for ALL American’s, including police.

So, ironically, I find myself lending voice to another kind of voiceless person, which are those in  policing, government, and other public sectors who themselves are targeted on multiple levels, and then, burdened with the need to keep silent, based on the heirarchy of blindly following orders, speaking when spoken to, keeping secrets, and doing as they are told.All of these can and do produce special, and specific mental disruptions, and certainly do affect mental processes; just as it does to citizens.

Of the OGS denialists, there seems to be a unified version of “these people are all mentally ill,” whereas of those targeted, they are, until recently, fairly silent, and frequently compromised in ways that defy conventional explanations. One such “targeting” took place upon American diplomats, and the US government clearly and decidedly implicated “sound weapons”in a main stream news story carried by the Associated Press.

So, of those who practice OGS, and those who are targeted, few know that police officers, and law enforcement in general are among the most targeted of all “individuals” as this new scheme of database abuse has some of them in it’s sights, as it once had common  criminals, and political targets in it’s vast net. Also in the net are frequently targeted diplomats, foreign service employees, and more. Then, beyond American’s being targeted, there is the fact that their relatives and associates are also targeted.

When I, for one, sit down to contemplate “what is America?” and “what is Democracy,” like most, I come up with the answer that we are world leaders and that the United States Constitution is a document written for everyone-it is written for the alt-left protester and the crybully as much as it is written for the alt-right racists and their affiliated groups who argue over statues in culture wars, rather than statutes which are violated every day by those who have abused citizens via database collection, and as such the Constitution, due process, which should be the focal point of our “American” discussion, has bee subsumed by identity politics of race class and gender wars; and Syria, or Iran is “our” enemy, instead of those who are tearing us apart, and using the Constitution as toilet paper; because regardless of the mess that international finance, and black operations of any and every kind put us in, we are, all still American’s FIRST.

And in that light, policing takes on an especially important role: that of “upholding an oath” to protect American’s, FIRST from enemies “both foreign and domestic.” This oath is not one that includes “well, you know, that American, versus that American is a better American, so we don’t have to protect him or her.” And it certainly does not include overlooking the long term, and frequently harmful targeting that factions of the LE community perpetrate against other factions of the LE community.

I myself have several members of my family who worked and who work in policing. And like all families, I also have many family members targeted-an  uncle just returned from Israel; an uncle who runs an American business that is highly targeted by mobsters and others; a cousin who is a past and current legal counsel for two former sitting presidents. And my own father- a Korea veteran, wore a wire for the FBI in the 1960’s, which certainly explains why I have chosen to write, rather than any other course of action, to peacefully protest the subversion of Democracy via database abuse, and it’s accompanying blackmail schemes.

As such, I have written this blog as a guide, and to encourage others to write their own, based in this as an example. My readership has blossomed, and certainly, the stories they are reading validate each and every thesis herein. My other work can be seen in other places, and I will continue to write as long as I am able, for the word is indeed mightier than the sword, if the hornets nest that I have kicked up here by breaking my own silence is any indicator.

On that note, let me add a few sprinkles of salt and pepper to (((cooking analogy thanks to Libra who hates it when I use his seekrit nym without accreditation)))  the story herein:

1. I have been approached by no less than 6 people in the last three months who call themselves targeted individuals. One was a hacker,  two were Viet Nam era veterans, one was his ‘running partner’ who mentioned a certain man who was imprisoned for terrorism in 2001 or so;  one was a bag lady, one just a street kid who wished he could hack better. Another was chased out of his neighbrhood because he reads leftist literature, and his kid has autism.Three black, two hispanic. One white. This is more “TI’s” than I have ever met in such a short span of time.
2. I watched over a period of 8 years as my life became ‘infiltrated’ and coincidence after coincidence piled up, as did compromising situations, situations that directly affected my life and safety, and much more. Finally, I will note that a relative of mine is affiliated with a certain database which contains the identities of every single American or foreigner who has ever passed a background check, or who has been fingerprinted-and this database was the exact one which was also used during the elections in Hugo Chavez’ elections. And as such, I blew the whistle when it was compromised BY those who work IN the exact organizations that are paid to protect that information. There is today, such a collaboration between those who work in corporations, and those who work in law enforcement to undermine us all via database abuse, and the selective leaking of information for political reasons.
3. Like any whistle blower, journalist, or anyone else who has ever endured OGS, I can say with certainty that I fear for my life and safety, and the lives and safety of my family members. As such, I write this to inform the public at large, and those who have sought to compromise me that you are on notice; and I hope the wheels of government find you, and prosecute you to the fullest extent of  the law.

Lastly, on a refreshing note: I believe to the fullest extent that what I put forwards herein is a valid thesis which can and will be useful to those who are in similar positions. And to those who I might feel mocked, chided, or derided herein, maybe take a look at your own thesis, your own complicity, or your own immorality, and ask yourself why the things I write here are a challenge to you. But I for one, hope that my peaceful dissent and resistance can be seen as exactly that, and for the criminal, civil defense lawyer or other constitutional rights scholar; to those in the healing professions, and those in the wider dialectic find value herein.

Eleanor White tries to change the terms of the OGS argument for the better, and others contemplate civil lawsuits against OGS

What is Organized gang stalking and why Eleanor White did not like the term

My focus, and I urge all targets to adopt this focus, is on how to speak and write to UNAWARE members of the public, which most quickly and easily helps them understand what this crime is all about.–Eleanor White

Eleanor White was a crusader who raised awareness of OGS, and as such, she tried like many to change the terms of the argument, starting with what many consider to be a loaded term- “gang stalking,” which discredits those who have encountered this nefarious practice.

If you are a researcher of organized gang stalking, a therapist, or psychologist or a civil or criminal defense lawyer charged with the care or representation of TI’s, take note that Eleanor White’s work is rapidly being scrubbed from the web.

But as a term of an influence operation, it is very descriptive of those who stalk gangs-in the “jargon” or the “argot” language of policing, it is in fact and practice a valid term. Search this blog for “NSA data theft pipeline” or “CalGang database which demonstrate how databases are used to track and entrap “gang members” from birth.

And maybe read up on how the LEIU’s stated purpose of breaking the law in order to create cases became a national and now international practice back in the 1970’s as their stated goal was to chase “organized crime.”

Here below is the discussion about the term gang stalking, from Eleanor White:

 

Chazzy

Posts: 2069

Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 2:52 am

Law of Parties

“One of the few prosecutors I talked to who accepted the “reality” of my situation called it participatory stalking which probably is a better term because the individuals involved are participating in a stalking at someone’s request. There is always one person who “targets” the victim. In some states where they have what’s called the “Law of Parties” the “participants” can also be charged as a “party to the crime.”

It’s a matter of semantics. In a general sense I use the word cause stalking to indicate someone being targeted because of their involvement in something that results in their being targeted by a group who are motivated by political and/or religious positions and I use the word gang stalking to indicate someone being targeted, as noted above, simply to discredit them and their complaint against someone. And they do act similarly to the way a gang acts. It is a form of bullying behavior in both instances. The “participants” are bullies. Which is why they so willingly participate. But both are participatory stalking simply on the basis of the participation.

One member has posted about her psychosis. She was not psychotic to begin with. She became psychotic as a result of the post traumatic stress and has won half the battle by acknowledging it. The cause of the psychosis is something psychologists and psychiatrists overlook when “treating” a stalking victim. They also do not “know it.”

Eleanor White says:

“Participatory” stalking carries the danger that some may interpret that as what is called “stalking by proxy.” Stalking by proxy is the usual single stalker, who is the sole source of the criminal activity, enlisting the help of others.

That’s not what organized stalking is. Organized stalking is carried on by an international network of stalking groups in each community. These groups, according to David Lawson and my own observations, think they are “helping police” keep someone “dangerous” under control.”

My focus, and I urge all targets to adopt this focus, is on how to speak and write to UNAWARE members of the public, which most quickly and easily helps them understand what this crime is all about. This includes carefully reflecting on how unware people assimilate information that is negative, information they’d rather not hear about. That’s our greatest need.

“Gang” stalking utterly fails at that.”

Chazzy later notes:

I have to add that some people do know the reality. And simply are afraid of speaking out. Some organizations that deal with domestic abuse/violence have spoken out about the problem of law enforcement “looking the other way” when the situation involves a law enforcement officer. But they are quickly silenced. But reality is reality. And if law enforcement “looks the other way” with its own it is reasonable to assume that many of these officers who are abusers themselves are going to “look the other way” with other abusers. The same dynamic is at work with regard to stalking victims in many cases. The officer doesn’t see a problem and decides they will be the prosecutor and make the call themselves instead of allowing a prosecutor to. One reason why so few cases are prosecuted may be that so few cases are actually taken to a prosecutor. It is a problem that has begun to affect all victims.

One other reality is that the “professions” including law and medicine do attract sociopaths who in many cases simply are looking for a “position of authority” that in essence allows them to view themselves above the law. They seek out positions of authority that allow them to abuse that authority in order to be able to abuse others. The “code of honor” is at work in all the “professions” not just law enforcement.

The bottom line is stalking victims are left to fend for themselves. Part of the “fending” is accepting that those we turn to in most cases turn their backs to us.”

Eleanor later replies:

Click to access osatv.pdf

… you will see that local community members are co-opted by spreading vicious lies about the target, often that the target is a child molester. Anyone with half a brain can see that immediately, so it’s not a problem to explain why community members participate.

I’ve had people call me, a senior lady, a pedophile to my face, and spit on the sidewalk in front of me. A colleague in another city in this province was a successful mainstream media reporter. She also is a senior and has brutal harassment everywhere she goes by people who believe she is a child molester.

The problem is, most targets are so flustered by their experience that they forget to mention that important motivation.

You can hold the opinion that organized stalking is “gang” stalking but clearly you are not a target. Commonly known gangs, youth, ethnic, biker, Mafia, are NOT carrying out organized stalking. If you say they are, you are not painting an accurate picture and are making it more difficult for OS targets to achieve justice.

As I explained, the stalkers are community members from every walk of life who have been told they are “helping police keep dangerous criminals under control.”

As I explained, any reference to “gang” stalking with unaware people throws the conversation way off on an irrelevant side track, burning up all the available attention span.

If you insist on calling this “gang” stalking, I hope you will minimize your use of that term as it does not help our cause.

We all need to EDUCATE THE PUBLIC about the reality of organized stalking, and do so regardless of whether the perps see it as a “reaction” or not. If we don’t educate the public, the nightmare of organized stalking will never end.

(A good step in that direction would be to find a way to force the National Center for Victims of Crime to stop treating OS as mental illness, and include it in their educational materials.)

I’m sad to report that the relatively small number of targets who do speak out choose absolutely the very worst things to say and write. This is such a huge problem I don’t see any way it will be solved in my lifetime. Targets do not care at all about how their words are received by the public – all they want to do is rant and shout about their pain.

Now that is perfectly natural, and it is NOT the “fault” of the very human OS targets. But this natural and blameless behaviour is keeping the perps in business.

To see examples of different activism material and my credibility ratings, visit:

http://www.multistalkervictims.org/creviews

To see a booklet of the things I have learned (the hard way) over my 15 years as an activist, visit:

Click to access osih.pdf

Eleanor White

Talking with unaware people throws the conversation way off on an irrelevant side track, burning up all the available attention span.

If you insist on calling this “gang” stalking, I hope you will minimize your use of that term as it does not help our cause.

 

 

The three Little Pigs and one Big, truly bad in a “good way” Wolf.

“Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.”-the Shirky-Masnik bureaucracy perpetuation principle.

A tale of two Doctors: Moss David Posner versus Lorraine Sheridan, and the author of the resoundingly debunked study on gang stalking.

The Good Doctor Posner

Dr. Moss David Posner was an M.D., and a former Viet Nam draft resistor– a man for whom involuntary conscription into the military forces was both unethical, and a necessary act of resistance, as he was charged with the care of his elderly parents. He made a reluctant decision to become a conscientious objector against the Viet Nam draft.

Like many men of his era,  and men of all era’s where men are seen as cheap dsiposable  labor and military cannon fodder, he was targeted and prosecuted with every niggling and quibbling detail under the laws that existed at the time- and those laws targeting men as potential victims of the sex-biased draft. The local draft board “expressly found that Posner was not a “genuine conscientious objector,” and like all laws that target male labor, male resistance, or male calls for ethical treatment-and that attempt to frame, or conscript men into violence one way or another, Posner lost his bid at resistance (the Domestic Violence Industry is the modern reaction formation from the MIC, and it’s dominists and zionists to men who resisted the draft).

Years later, after service to the state of California working with prisoners in some of the worlds most inhumane prisons, he was fired for treating prisoners humanely. He died in 2011, and was buried in Beth Israel cemetery, just as gang stalking had started to become a main stream topic.

For many decades after his act of civil disobedience, and throughout his prison advocacy efforts, where he quite nefariously advocated for the humane treatment of elderly prisoners-Dr. Posner endured organized gang stalking for decades, and he counseled others who also have been targets of this military-police-community policing-corporate stalking nightmare. He taught coping mechanisms and tactics on how to “fight back” using peaceful means of resistance, and and he is remembered as a man who fought “the good fight.”

Here are two of the several video’s that he and others put on Youtube to preserve his efforts, but there are many more, and you can find tidbits about him around the net:

 

In order to understand the exact nature of how the discrediting and disinformation smear campaigns work in regards to gang stalking, here is a screen capture of a Google search for Dr. Posner’s video’s, with Google autocomplete utilizing “suggestions,” which any hypnotist, propagandist, or other influence operator will recognize by its colloquial name, which is “mind control:

 

Also keep in mind that Google, which  keeps a “back door” open on all Google searches, routing everything you search directly to the NSA and the CIA, but also to the FBI and some 14 other intelligence agencies-and which have notoriously co-opted the communication channels via back door searches in real time of all Google data. And, Google is basically a CIA creation to begin with. Wait a minute: did the CIA create Google, or did Google create the CIA?  In a word of smoke and mirrors, sometimes the cut outs look identical.

There literally is no difference between them now, except for the black bag jobs, and the assassinations and high level targeting of…consumers, of course. OH-and the physical as opposed to mental torture. Oh and the budgets- Google makes WAAAAAAY more money. Oh wait…..

Related Story: How the CIA built Google

“They” see gangs of deep state parrots, crisis PR professionals, and psychologists who are complicit with the Military Industrial Complex and the Carceral State.

Those Other doctors

In the summer of 2016, as the American election was in full swing, and the partisan MSM as revealed as a mere tool of deep state propaganda dissemination rather than anything even remotely close to being the heralded “fourth estate” that championed the will of the people, a string of mass shootings took place across America, and across the world. Lie most staged terror events that are eventually traced to deep state interests, Israel, or one of many international banking cartels, the summer of 2016 was unique in that the collusion between deep state narrative and actual homicides was linked irrevocably.

The issue of “targeted individuals” who are victims of organized gang stalking was linked as well. because some of these mass shooters had contacted online resource and support groups to attempt to get the help that modern psychiatry will not, and cannot provide to TI’s, chiefly because psychiatry is in bed with the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC), the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), and the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC), all of which are also involved heavily with the drug companies and the mega-pharmaceutical interests.

What a difference a few decades make. In the era of Dr Posner resisting the draft and today, deep state involved mass shootings have swelled, as has the PIC and endless war. And one important detail that cannot be missed is how deeply in bed all of the above named interests are with both psychiatry and Big Pharma, but also with main stream media(MSM), which is little more than a propaganda dispensary.

It is here where the internet became for some an outlet of alternative news, and hard hitting social critique that filled a gap where the left-which once spoke for prison refrm and humane treatment-slid to the right, and now spoke for endless war and incarceration rates that are at record levels.

Through fear inducement and morality panics, the old left had become the neo-con new right, and they began to craft very misanthropic rationalizations and trans-humanist messages in Kantian “greater good” packages.  And all of this with “official sources” backing deep state social engineering schemes, one of which was gun control through the memetic that “targeted individuals” are dangerous.

It was at this un-American juncture where the New York Times met the Canadian “journalist” Mike McPhate, and his cohabitants in deep state propaganda factories, Australian psychologist and speech pathologist Dr. Loraine Sheridan, both of whom willingly and not-naively played along with disinformation and discrediting of TI’s and other vulnerable individuals-but also broad brushed all of those who experience abuse buy hidden surveillance state players into the category of mentally ill.

Like much of the NYT’s recent propaganda work, Sheridan was the perfect fit for their “official source,” and no doubt she has been handsomely rewarded since she forever juxtaposed junk science with mental health in a way that foreshadowed the death of the reputability of both journalism and psychiatry .

The infamous article was ominously billed as

“United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers“

By MIKE McPHATE JUNE 10, 2016

 

Here, below, is the clown prince of information mediation about gang stalking via the discrediting narrative His name is Mike McPhate, and this picture is from his Twitter account (which was curiously silent just after the backlash from this dubious piece). I suggest you contact him-frequently-and ask him about gang stalking. And-contact him from an anonymous email on “the internet,” because the study that he supports believes in anonymous input.

 

Mike McPhate of the NYT wrote the piece that quoted Sheridan: Deep State Stooge, or just another Mockingbird in the flock? Either way, @mcphate is the poster child for the question: is the MSM just another MIC tool of social control and fake news?

And here below, once again  is the “official source” and “only person to ever do a study on gang stalking that was quoted all over the internet as an authority on organized gang stalking- his handmaiden in propaganda dispensing, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan (not including Posner, Dietrich, or dozens of others who have done studes on this EXACT toic, and several related topics-which McPhate did not. Such is the nature of journalism today-who needs a fact checker-or facts for that matter, when the deep state is running propaganda into your mouth and out your ass?)

Without irony, these two concocted a narrative of “what is organized gang stalking” by consulting an arguably mentally ill person, Timothy Trespas*, and then, adding to their “sources” the results of Sheridan’s study where she literally, and without irony, interviewed “the internet” for her data, without speaking to any real person, in person. Let that sink in a bit, and get back to me. I thou, Ich Du and all that, right Dr. Wood?

But one of the main themes from all these “official sources” seems to be that shutting down un-mediated, un-infiltrated, and un-fileted discussion by victims of OGS is a necessary step to understanding the dialogue-and that by isolating individuals who have been gang staked, problem solved!

Even and especially, one of the few others who have attempted to muddy the dialectic of OGS, Elizabeth E. Dietrich, also recommends “isolation” of “these” individuals, because conversation-words- are somehow dangerous. Not without irony or coincidence, she is widely quoted by those in the gay community, and those who believe that every Twitter post have a “trigger warning.” Speech, it seems, is a threat to some people-especially those who have harmed others with junk science.

But these people are not simply attempting to stifle free expression, they are also trying to control a narrative, which has historically been the work of the CIA itself, and even the New York Times as a propaganda outlet for the CIA to take a leak.

As one example of how tightly controlled and diabolical all of this narrative control is, one must look at Sheridan’s partner in crime that co-authored the study, David V. James, who studies stalking, and authors pieces that indicate words are a threat to him as well, and all of their work, one notices almost immediately, is tailored to the current terrorism and “threat assessment” funding sources, and then, threat assessments of critical opinions of their ‘work.’ And all of that without a blink of irony, as these two perpetrated a major hoax where words became threats, and actual victims discredited.

To whit, here is some titles of his work:

The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre: preventing harm and facilitating care

David V. James

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789941003596981

http://www.tandfonline.com/author/James%2C+David+V

 

And this one below, a classic form of pre-emptive CYA when one of his botched ‘patients’ gets wise to operand conditioning, or other forms of the classic Martha Mitchell type official pinion gas-lighting that is prevalent in creationist communities, or police states and third world dictatorships, as well as neo-con artists that finance navel gazing junk science:

Stalking, harassment and aggressive/intrusive behaviours towards general practitioners: (2) associated factors, motivation, mental illness and effects on GPs

David V. James

Which brings me back to Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, and the difference between Dr. Moss David Posner, activist, prisoners rights advocate, and Viet Nam War era draft resistor: the main targets of MIC stalking are always peace activists, dissidents, and others who challenge the lockup on “narrative.” Or who use “bad words,” that challenge these other coward directly.

While victims of OGS range from whistle blowers like decorated intelligence officer William Binney, to common victims of real estate developers and the llocal police such as Timothy Trespas, what any and all ‘studies’ of gang stalking indicate is that the pro’s want to keep a lid on it in the least, and to stop discussion about it entirely without their “divine intervention”. Cuz, bad words hurt waaaay more than bombs on babies heads in Syria, or Gaza; and certainly woods hertz way more to the sensitives in the trigger warning crowd.

Here is Dr. Sheridan’s work, co-authored by James:

Complaints of group-stalking (‘gang-stalking’): an exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants

Lorraine P. Sheridan & David V. James

The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & PsychologyPublished online: 16 Jun 2015

Then, adding to the “BDS is Hitler!!” echo chamber that these academics are trapped in, there is Elizabeth E. Dietrich, who comes to similar conclusions-that OGS claimants are dangerous, and should be isolated. Without doubt, all these ‘official sources’ agree-isolation, and then, defamation via diagnoses is the key to containing the narrative, and that these ‘crazies’ must be silenced.

Where have we heard THAT before? Why, nowhere other than the famous case of Martha Mitchell, who helped break the Nixon Watergate scandal, when her psychologist called her delusional. This is called “the Martha Mitchell effect” which is a close cousin of “the Streisand Effect.”

Here is Dietrich’s easily discredited work-maybe you can help her, and  make her ‘internet famous’ and maybe, explain her flawed, kind of dangerous reasoning about isolating individuals (which has NEVER been shown to be a positive therapy):

2015

Gang stalking : internet connectivity as an emerging mental health concern

Elizabeth E. Dietrich

Is it just me, or are all these Nazi sounding names on these psychologists a coincidence? Maybe I am losing my mind, with a bit of help, because no psychologist I have ever known would or ethically could agree that silencing victims-or isolating actually mentally ill people- is EVER a good idea.

These names: David V. James, and Lorraine Sheridan, and Elizabeth Dietrich, should forever exist next to names like the Nazi Joseph Mengele, and the CIA’s LSD doctor, Sidney Gottlieb, and the CIA torture psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jesssen who made 81 million pushing junk science, phony psychology, and human rights abuses.

These diabolical MIC people and those who tailor their opinions for maximum police state dollars are really are practicing what has historically been called “punitive psychology” in many cases.  Not that some claimants aren’t possibly “ill,” but also, many certainly are not, such as the cases where whistle blowers and reporters  like Jessica Miles, and many others describe the same exact things as victims of OGS; or where low level politicians like Bob Deis in Stockton CA are stalked and harassed by the police union.

And, the practices that are described by victims are certainly the kind of thing that can cause stress, and PTSD, as well as what appear to be delusions because the “good guys” are in fact one and the same as those who harass them. And when you add official source gas-lighting from the ‘healing professions’, certainly that can’t help.

So if anything in the data is clear, it is that psychologists are obsessed with narrative control, and discrediting those who claim they have been gang stalked.

SO, any legitimate researcher, civil or criminal defense lawyer or other advocate that seeks to understand a targeted individuals complaint for a lawsuit about organized gang stalking, one must factor in the ‘suppression mechanism” that some psychologists are using.

But Timothy Trespas, who was featured prominently on the cover of the story, and who looks like a guy who has spent one two many nights on skid row, coincidentally lives in one of New York’s gentrifying communities, where there is a high correlation between the likelihood of low income people being harassed and targeted with gang stalking, and property developers who hire teams of armed thugs to push the homeless out of these areas-as their is a connection between OGS and real estate.

While the most famous case of real estate related gang stalking could well be the case of Bob Deis in Stockton Ca, happened in Stockton CA, where  the police and fire unions bought the house next to him and waged a war of attrition after Deis suggested cuts to pension funds, there are many others.

I could go on, but for any genuine researcher of organized gang stalking, the tale of two doctors should be instructive. One man with ethics, a conscience, and a cause; a bunch of others like the many heads of a Hydra, or Medusa herself, squawking  lies and disinformation like panhandlers and hucksters with their paws so deep in the deep state that it is nearly impossible to refute them properly.

But if we put on our thinking caps, and disconnect the wires from these ‘offical sources’ I am sure there’s hope for TI’s-once we locate the source of their gas-lighting (which comes from official sources) and their “electronic harassment” (which is what we know today as the total surveillance state and its constant wiretapping of ALL citizens, hooked in with community policing that has so far existed in hidden form.) Then, we can clealy see that the only “implants” involved are these people, planted like a CIA leak in mainstream media.

Organized gang stalking and linguistics: targeted individuals are often victims of linguistic manipulation, aka, soft force mind control

Any blog, anywhere on the topic of OGS is derived from within a wider dialectic of gang stalking, and then, contains individual narrative, influenced by the language and terminology of others within the dialectic. As such, linguistic analyses infers that the Sapir-Whorf hypotheses, and linguistic relativity of strong and weak language applies.

“The principle of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. Popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, or Whorfianism, the principle is often defined to include two versions. The strong version says that language determines thought, and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories, whereas the weak version says that linguistic categories and usage only influence thought and decisions”

from Wikipedia “linguistic relativity”

I have already demonstrated that the OGS dialectic is a mind control and influence operation full of information, disinformation, and misinformation (and here, and here, and here, and here) on some-or on many levels. Also, I have demonstrated that it has real world consequences, and that law enforcement is not doing its job to stop those who encourage the dialectic, and who profit from it; and that law enforcement is quite frequently involved directly, and indirectly.

But more than any one proof is the general flow of the data, as we discover that the dialectic itself is purely and easily understood as language in action to influence, confirm, interrogate, or otherwise manipulate individuals who, for whatever reason, find themselves trapped-entrapped-within the dialectic, which is itself a form of neuro linguistic programming (NLP).

While most targeted individuals do not or cannot answer or state openly or apparently the six w’s of journalistic inquiry -who directed them to the dialectic? What happened just before you were directed or redirected into this dialogue? Where did this happen?when did this happen? Why did you get brought into this abusive dialectic? How did you become aware of the dialectic?-the evidence is clear that memetics and influence via language are at work, and that certain people are involved, and many others are, statistically, not even aware that such a dialectic -that of organized gang stalking-exists. Any researcher, lawyer, psychologist or other concerned researcher should be aware of the need to ask these questions.

But what does exist a solid fact, or set of facts as regards the language and terms of OGS: that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. This is undeniable, and there exists evidence of this fact in every log ever written about OGS.

Then, when you add influence operations, pseudo-legal “investigations” by LEO’s and LEIU members across the internet-which is used malevolently as both a tool of investigation, aka “webterrogation,” and also as a purely vindictive and petty tool of harassment by bullies in official places- we se a new picture emerge: that the root of the problem is that the internet backbone is full of cancerous, state sponsored and illegal activity, directed at targeted persons, groups, and their ideas; and that the Panopticon that has been designed by bad actors in high places has been abused-which we also know with plentiful evidence.

So, if one chose to, one could analyse the structure of the dialectic is itself for evidence that OGS is a real, and directed, and valid potential complaint, rather than a hoarde of mentally ill folks who sabotage legitimate mechanisms of communication for nefarious purposes, when in fact, it is state, and institutional, and academic, and professional actors that are this exact disease ridden apathetic and complicit group, as this blog attempts to document and demonstrate.

The evidence I direct the reader to herein should be an ample and well endowed starting point for any researcher, sociologist, psychologist, criminal or civil rights defense attorney to have a secure starting point for any case that involves claims of OGS. As such, I invite you to test or retest my evidence, and come up with your own hypotheses, but what I have herein is fairly hard to refute, and each refutation opens a door to a new line of inquiry, which has so far been missing from the discussion.

But clearly, it is not merely a dialogue of the mentally ill talking to others who are mentally ill, unless we are willing to engage in the fact based discussion about institutional sociopathy, and narcissistic abuse by those in power directed at those who do not have power.

And as we see in example after example that some, who have power, often working in institutions or governments who are very well financed are targeting and directing others-who are generally low status or low intellect individuals into this abusive dialectic, and keeping them enmeshed in occulted and unclear, and often nefarious scenarios within the Panopticon that our internet has, in fact and practice, become. In that light, we can see that the internet is in fact and also in ractice, oe of the largest and most potentially dubious forms of electronic abuse ever, being used to cause harm or to force ‘normalization’ upon unwitting subjects.

Gang stalking and retired law enforcement and LEIU’s

Eleanor White is one of the few who have a internet presence documenting gang stalking, and also, one of the few who has revealed that retired law enforcement agents participate in or otherwise instigate gang stalking.

She is widely discussed in the online TI community, and has several websites that became inactive around 2011, just as others began to document this “phenomenon.” Ms. White claims she was smeared for decades in Canada as a pedophile.

I personally find her work questionable or suspect for two reasons: 1) she is heavily engaged in the “DEW’s” side of the discussion, which largely discredits others in the OGS community that are reporting police abuses and corporate or institutional level harassment, and even repeating words and phrases and entire belief systems that are clearly the products of influence operations aka soft force mind control 2) she always uses the word “raven” in her work, and ravens are synonymous with signals intelligence community-one of the ways that operatives signal to each other online.

You can find many examples online where blackbirds, ravens and more are used to signal, but especially note that in CIA funded domestic control and infiltration programs such as MHCHAOS*-which was operated by the Navy– of the 1960’s, where media mockingbirds and others literally mocked the “truth,” and as some online today, using backdoor access to Twitter’s firehose from the domestic spy and democracy subversion centers called “Fusion Centers”, all of which go by different names, and which make them harder to pin  down- just like a flock of crows itself; birds are indeed a theme in signals intelligence and elsewhere when OGS is mentioned. As such, “birds” are part of military jargon, and “argot” language and integral to OGS.

Related: The Society of Old Crows-retired military and LE signals intelligence uses the blackbird as its mascot.

You can contact them on Twitter @AOCrows if you have any doubt about blackbirds, ravens, swallows, or rats nibbling through the bottom planks of American Democracy

I am not saying that much or most of White’s work is not credible, but there are a few red flags for me, personally. Your interpretation might differ. And I am NOT saying that here experience is entirely poorly described either, as she ws one of those who frequently encouraged others, and also encouraged the use of common terms to describe the experiences of TI’s, most notably advising that the use of the agency created term “gang stalking” was itself a poor descriptor, and a way for those who have the power to manipulate others to force them to use their language via sheep dipping the individual complaint with a poorly chosen term.

It is now well known that retired cops, and other intelligence or investigative  agency old timers are involved in organized gang stalking, as they do the dirty work and act out revenge fantasies for active LEO’s on people who they target. Most cited is that fact that Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU’s) and Fusion Centers handle much of the high level targeting and especially the stalking, but also, that they utilize hidden resources, and exploit previous relationships in government and LE to break the law, and create cases.

And, whereas once their was doubt that America’s police and intelligence services are waging a domestic war of “us and them” on citizens outside the view of the courts and Congress, slowly we see that the law no longer applies to some, and that due process has been denied to ALL Americans in the NSA/FBI/CIA domestic spying pipeline that provable targets individuals, but also, flagrantly violates the rights of many in their quest to create a narrative.

Related Story: The Electronic Frontier Foundation documents 40,000 flagrant violations of due process by the FBI

So- partially to answer the recurring questions that many TI’s ask, such as  “where do the gang stalkers get the money to target me?” and “but who has the time to target me in such an elaborate scheme of violations?” the answers become more clear-there is no law and no oversight of the agencies that have effectively blackmailed Congress and the courts into submission.

Acting as agents of social control, and outside of the constitutional protections of due process, these cops work in ways that violate the letter and the spirit f the law as they harass, monitor, wiretap, or otherwise work outside of the courts and the law to enact petty revenge, intimidate, bully, or otherwise violate targeted individuals.

As awareness begins to mount on this topic, and many sane and reputable people such as whistle blowers and journalists report being targets of these hidden domestic campaigns, and as damage control has gone into high gear-the internet is becoming a target itself- a target of ‘revisionism’ that seeks to hide the few details that expose who the perpetrators actually are.

Eleanor White is widely said to be a leader of the OGS awareness movement. Although this author has no opinion one way or another on her credibility, I can say that she has at times brought interesting cockroaches out of their hidey holes-as the thin blue line sometimes cracks when she shows up on radio programs or online discussion boards.

Here below is an example of evidence that retired law enforcement agents participate in OGS, but also, as I document, how they are currently scrubbing the internet to hide this fact. And I will note, no other blogger or OGS reporter has documented either of these facts.

Swallows and Ravens: the language of Spies or the language of “people caught in an ideological echo chamber?”

Duckduckgo Search Terms: “Eleanor White had called in to the Richard Syrett show on Mojo Radio, 640 AM”

Original link: http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/www.MultiStalkerVictims.org/default.htm

The following text was part of the material that I saved offline last year as I researched this topic:

“Eleanor White had called in to the Richard Syrett show on Mojo Radio, 640 AM, Toronto about organized stalking. A short while later, another caller called in to “explain” to me that what happens is that retired police officers sometimes “make life Hell” for selected people “until certain conditions are met.”

The examples the caller gave were deadbeat dads paying up their child support, or sex offenders moving away. Clearly, the original Ku Klux Klan setup has been extended to include many other “undesirables”.

“Prophetically, an acquaintance coolly said to me, a year after I left the lab, ‘You are in a police net you will never get out of … for the rest of your life.’ http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/www.MultiStalkerVictims.org/default.htm

Screen captures that document the now-broken links to this web-page (just after I documented this elsewhere online). If one thing is highly targeted, it is the online comments and other “leaks” that reveal this aspect of OGS:

Note the two classes of persons above who retired law enforcement officers (who took an oath to uphold our Constitution) and others working with them target for harassment “child support debtors and sex offenders.” First they came for the—-.

Now, one piece of evidence is interesting, but other blogs and media formats also document these situations as well, and especially noteworthy are the cases of Jeff Pataky, a blogger who wrote “Bad Phoenix Cops,” or Bob Deis the former Stockton city manager who was gang stalked by the police union, and former marine John Lang, who was found dead in his burning home as firefighters parked blocks away.

The web is full of disinformation, paranoia and other classic official source gas-lighting but the video’s and testimony of  John Lang, a father, a marine, and a police corruption whistle blower, captured some of the most credible video on the web of what these intimidation campaigns look like[link here]. He claims also that the local PD was constantly trying to “pedofy” him just as White claims she was pedofied (this is also a word from the LE jargon).

Here, below is one random comment that also documents this common perception that certain classes of people are targeted outside the law by those who feel they are  above the law-that they have somehow earned the ‘right’ to harass others. Most notably- the  classes of individuals who can be “targeted and harassed” has bloomed from child support owing fathers and sex offenders to seven categories of citizens who are targeted.

First, they came for——–, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a ——–. Then, the category bloomed to seven other classes of people….(see footnote below)

1)child support and unscrupulous collectors, 2)domestic violence anything, 3)people who except plea bargins and “deals,”or suspended sentences instead of saying “not guilty,” 4) any call to 911, 5) insufficient representation by an inadequate attorney who fails to inform you of all the possible consequences and side effects of anything short of not guilty, trial by jury and acquittal/dismissal, 6)any sex offender accusation (even public urination) or worse, 7) beating the police at their own game or having them think you’ve gotten away with something are all good points from which to start when looking for answers

I tried to track down the person who commented on that forum but could not find the ‘nym’ “George T. Boneyard” anywhere else on the internet except one web forum similar to Ebay that sells goods. The answer that Boneyard gave, however, encapsulates in a paragraph what can be found in many other blogs and forums online.

And, without irony, I note that this comment appeared on Techdirt.com, which is both an excellent website, but also, one of the very few that has ever attempted to shine light on OGS. The article was covering how an accidental click on a weblink brought a person into the wonderful world of hidden and secret, pervasive and horrific investigation and harassment.

And that man, Jeffrey Kantor, was one of the very few who have ever attempted to document this “phenomenon” of police, fire, security industry, and military OGS.

From the article (but follow the link-it is an excellent read):

“In October of 2009, Kantor used the search engine Google to try to find, ‘How do I build a radio-controlled airplane,'” he states in his complaint. “He ran this search a couple weeks before the birthday of his son with the thought of building one together as a birthday present. After typing, ‘how do I build a radio controlled’, Google auto-completed his search to, ‘how do I build a radio controlled bomb.'”

From that point on, Kantor alleges coworkers, supervisors and government investigators all began “group stalking” him. Investigators used the good cop/bad cop approach, with the “bad cop” allegedly deploying anti-Semitic remarks frequently. In addition, his coworkers at Appian (a government contractor) would make remarks about regular people committing murder-suicides (whenever Kantor expressed anger) or how normal people just dropped dead of hypertension (whenever Kantor remained calm while being harassed).

Kantor also claims he was intensely surveilled by the government from that point forward.

He claims government officials monitored his book purchases and home computer, and implied that everything he did was being monitored…

Kantor [also] claims the stalking spilled over into his personal life when the government secretly attached a GPS antenna to his car to track him.

Kantor alleges this harassment continued long after he lost his job at Appian (who he’s currently suing as well). The claims of stalking, harassment and surveillance fill a great deal of the 33-page filing. His suit also claims that personal information obtained through “FISA warrants” was routinely used against him (and repeated back to him) by a number of people — the so-called “group stalking” or “gang stalking.”

Most importantly, Kantor’s lawsuit came at a time BEFORE we knew with certainty that Fusion Centers are actively disrupting our communications; and just around the time when Edward Snowden revealed this Democracy destroying plot by the deep state.

So, a therapist, psychologist, or other care provider, legal counsel, or judge or jury member should be instructed that such appearances of mental illness that indict the nebulous “the government” is in fact a much wider, much better organized entrapment and harassment scheme.

———————————————————————————————–

*While the 1960’s might well have defeated the sex biased military draft, where Dr. Moss David Posner became a target, those efforts did not defeat the full militarization of democratic processes, or the total takeover of the individual citizens right to dissent. In fact today what we see as “targeted individuals” are in fact an extenuation of the CIA’s “executive assassination” programs that were hinted at by Seymour Hersh, but instead, they target activists and potential influencers of public discourse, such as an avowed targeted individual, Gavin Long aka Cosmo Setepenra, and the Ferguson MO activists who continue to be found shot dead in burning cars in mysterious “suicides.”

MHCHAOS was the program where the CIA had fully inserted itself into American domestic policy and democratic processes, participating in the subversion of American Constitutional rights of due process, and violating it’s charter. Common leaflet printers and major activists were targeted and all military agencies began the wok together on American soil, against democracy. Most are familiar with the FBI’s COINTELPRO, but few are aware that the US has not been an actual democracy since this era.

“Operation MH/CHAOS was the code name for a domestic espionage project conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency in the late1960s and early 1970s. Operation MH/CHAOS was the code name for a domestic espionage project conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency in the late1960s and early 1970s. MH/CHAOS: The CIA’s Campaign Against the Radical New Left and the Black Panthers is an insider’s account of the CIA’s Counterintelligence Staff’s Special Operations Group first charged by Presidents Lyndon Johnson and later by Richard Nixon to find foreign intelligence, terrorist, organizations or government contacts, controlling or influencing Anti-Vietnam War activists or American black extremists protesting, bombing and carrying out other anti-government, unlawful or illegal activities in the United States. The operation was launched under Director of Central Intelligence Richard Helms, by chief of counter-intelligence, James Jesus Angleton, and headed by Richard Ober. The program’s goal was to unmask possible foreign influences on the student antiwar movement. The “MH” designation signified that the program had a worldwide area of operations.”

Without irony, this author notes that the NSA/CIA/DHS/FBI and 13 other agencies are currently combing through the data of ALL American citizens alike, looking for evidence of crimes or blackmail material that can be leveraged against votes, and more, in an operation that makes the CIA’s 1960’s social experiment look like a gnat compared to today’s dying Athena.

Footnote: I spoke on te phone with a single mother of two grown children the other day, 08-16-2017. She is a homeowner who had applied for SSI, and who had been gang stalked for years by her block captains in a slander campaign in Coon Rapids, MN.

Her harassment included claims that she was “crazy” and “violent” and more, frequently after cmplaining about her neighbors loud parties;  and false arrests and eventually a fifty year restraining order-but no criminal conviction. As such, we see the new targets have bloomed to eight, as single mothers were once inviolable bastions of American virtue.

The couple who acted as block captains in the fashion of Stalin’s Russia, Hitler’s Germany, or Mao’s China, who I shall not yet name, harassed her for years with noise and more, and exacerbated her community to the point where she was demonized, and police encouraged repeated calls to her home.

Without irony, the couple who moved in next door to her has now moved out, and also, divorced or separated. She however, still has the 50 year restraining order, despite never having laid a hand on anyone.

 

Gang stalking and proof: proof costs money-who can compete with Goldman Sacks, or George Soros, or government stalkers deep pockets?

Who finances organized gang stalking, proof, George Soros, Goldman Sacks, Government Stalking.

“Who finances gang stalking?”

What’s the difference between 3 million and 4 billion dollars anyways? Decorated intelligence officer William Binney  built a machine to monitor the communications of foreign targets for just over 3 million. Then, he became a whistle blower when the NSA and the FBI targeted and harassed him– and they used “their machine” instead, which cost 4 BILLION dollars, and entraps the communications of EVERY AMERICAN.

Their version of the great terrorist/badguy/activist/journalist/whistleblower/pedophile  catcher machine (The TBAJWPCM72) costs the taxpayer between 52 and 72 billion dollars per year. And YOU pay for organized gang stalking every time you vote for security over liberty; your own silence over speaking up. And that isn’t counting the lawsuits that occur as a direct result of this “small town terrorism.”

Because of the hidden, well orchestrated and well financed occult (meaning hidden, and in this case, black budget) nature of organized gang stalking, proof is very hard to find in the narratives of those who claim they are stalked. However, as you read through this blog you will see several well documented incidents of systematic, organized harassment, and few of the people who report this are crazy, or mentally ill in the sense of organic mental illness.

What the victims of OGS are, often times, is under extreme stress, and duress, and sometimes under a form of psychosis that has been described in psychology, but not specifically in relation to tareted individuals, until we see that psychology is complicit in cases such as Martha Mitchell, and Jean Seberg, and maybe even your neighborhood “delusional person.”. And no doubt many Targeted Individuals do have pre-existing or recent onset symptoms of mental illness, and those who victimize them are frequently the cause of it.

What must be considered is a mental health related question of “who finances gang stalking?” This question routinely comes up in many blogs and video’s, but until recently, few of the bloggers attempted to answer this question. So, what must be considered is the proven cases of gang stalking that I have written about so far. Other researchers can find other proofs, and balance claims of OGS against what is extant, but here below arjust a e a few I have covered up to now.

Stockton city manager Bob Deis had the well heeled police/fire union move in next door to him and wage an endless campaign of noise terror, and more. This was financed by tax paying citizens, who can’t seem to find real work anywhere, while literal domestic terror is waged by public sectr employees to protect their double and riple police and fire pension funds. The situation was so absurd that they even bought the house next to Deis to pad their portfolio. Meanwhile, like many cities across America that are being bilked in the “see something say something” make work scheme’s of these public servants, Stockton was then, and is now, totally broke and in massive debt. Bob Deis lost his job.

Anti-corruption blogger Jeff Pataky had nearly an entire police department ruin his life, and it was financed by local, state and federal taxes paid by citizens. And if I recall, he was caught up in a domestic dispute with his wife who later dated or got “extremely close to” one of her heroic saviors from the police department, which is a common theme in many of these cases.Makes one wonder- if you have nothing to hide, then….

And in these two cases alone, we see a pattern emerge which I will flesh out later, bt it appears that a mercenary element within police and public unions and institutions is blatantly abusing their power, and benefiting financially.

For example, when Rick Krlich and his wife Cindy bought a house in Hubbard Ohio, and the local police overlooked and even participated in what amounts to a ten year harassment campaign similar to the year that Bob Deis endured, and that waged by the local fire chief ;or the seven plus years that Jeff Pataky was targeted, these campaigns domestic terror have consequences and real mental health effects.

And I am certain that local residents aren’t always aware that this is the way their funds are being spent-and certainly each of these cities gets federal dollars as well, which makes these local occurrences a federal question. I mean-how many fires do they have in Hubbard Ohio? So I imagine those engines, and the fire fighters in them aren’t very busy with anything OTHER THAN stalking Krlich.

Well known whistle blowers William Binney and Kirk Wiebe, Dianne Roark, and many more were fired for blowing the whistle on NSA spying on American’s, and the agencies then set out to destroy them. After Binney tried to stop the NSA from spying on American’s while also saving taxpayers a few billion dollars– he was fired, stalked, and indicted for it after the FBI kicked his doors in and tossed his house. And all that because he tried to save the taxpayers a few billion dollars. Remind me again- who are the good guys?

So- when the researcher of organized gang stalking encounters the question, often written in a mocking tone on the extant blogs online,  “but where do the gang stalkers get all the money??” it is usually “one of them,” mocking the impotence of the people to defend themselves against this new and horrific privacy rape, fraudulent spending, and military madness.

Of course, if you have nothing to hide-then let’s talk about who finances gang stalking, and let’s have a look at the way these massive black budgets are being spent. But stop trying to silence victims of it.Because it costs tax payers billions of dollars per year in waste, fraud, and abuse.

Thin Thread versus TrailBlazer: a 4 million dollar loss, at the expense of the taxpayers of the United States. Here is some of William Binney’s interview with Juan Gonzalez on NPR in 2012:

JUAN GONZALEZ: What—did it have a name, the program?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, it was called Thin Thread. I mean, Thin Thread was our—a test program that we set up to do that. By the way, I viewed it as we never had enough data, OK? We never got enough. It was never enough for us to work at, because I looked at velocity, variety and volume as all positive things. Volume meant you got more about your target. Velocity meant you got it faster. Variety meant you got more aspects. These were all positive things. All we had to do was to devise a way to use and utilize all of those inputs and be able to make sense of them, which is what we did.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And when they didn’t use your system, they—the NSA developed another or attempted to develop another system to do the same?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, that one failed. They didn’t produce anything with that one.

AMY GOODMAN: And that one was called?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Trailblazer, yeah.

AMY GOODMAN: Trailblazer, and—

WILLIAM BINNEY: I called it—I called it five-year plan number one. Five-year plan number two was Turbulence. Five-year plan number three is—

AMY GOODMAN: And Trailblazer cost how much money?

WILLIAM BINNEY: That was, I think, in my—my sense, was a little over $4 billion.

AMY GOODMAN: Four billion dollars.

WILLIAM BINNEY: Right.

AMY GOODMAN: But it was scuttled. It was done away with in 2006?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Yes, ’05, I think it was. But yes, that’s right. And we developed our program with $3 million, roughly.

Decorated intelligence officer William Binney’s sworn testimony here.

While on the surface, a casual researcher of organized gang stalking might not see the correlation between police and fire departments, and bloggers, and whistle blowers, most legitimate alternative media does see it; and legitimate psychologists can make the link. Further, in the cases above, we see the pattern: whistle blowing or challenging officials; real estate investments, federal dollars,well connected and well organized groups in positions of trust, and narrative control- who can and can’t have a job in modern America to pay a mortgage; and then, massive fraud on the courts and the localities that have no idea this is going on, thanks to the collusion of some in mass media, influence operations, and psychology.

So, when a psychologist might say (as Dr. Michael Wood said) “well, the term itself doesn’t appear in the literature,” or that ” these people who claim this all show clear indicators of delusions,”you can point them here, to this one article, and work your way back from here. While each case may be different in it’s facts or in it’s “onset” it is indisputable that it is a real thing, and it is very well financed.