The enemy of organized gang stalkers is an unique suspect: “individualism.” How Heng Choon Chan, and Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, are schtupping us with Hegellian phalluses.

So, up until now, we have seen many many examples of how gang stalking is related to policing, and community policing, aka “communitarian” policing, and how there are racial, class, gendered elements that conspire to phrase “the other” as mentally ill, rather than as persons needing protection that is guaranteed to them by due process rights, but which is more often than not denied to TI’s in ‘official source gas lighting’ campaigns, as may TI’s report this exact fact.

And, we have seen how the MSM has so far played along with this odd and dishonest narrative, literally framing the dialectic as that of dangerous crazy people versus “everyone else.” So it cannot be overlooked that this is an extension of psychology as a pseudo science, directly and LITERALLY related to Edward Bernay’s and “mind control.”

So now we must take a look at the type of material that Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, as well as other DVIC profiteers use to “organize” their version of a society. And the key here, it will be noted, is that these same are at war with “individuals.”

Here, from Heng Choon Chan and Lorraine Sheridan, we see another clear indicator that “individuality” is an issue, as many “targeted individuals” will tell you, but also, that these researchers are deliberately pairing the individual against the collective-and remember, that in the Hegelian Dialectic, constant conflict is a purely profitable model for some individuals, at the expense of many others who are targeted by them. In the case I am about to introduce, we see a comparison between a communist countries perceptions of stalking contrasted (conflicted) with western individualist perceptions.

And before I introduce the link between stalking and attacks on individuality-and many of those attacks BY the exact academics that believe in the collective-I would first like to point the reader to Sheridan’s following online, which clearly indicates two things: 1) she is closely affiliated with police and the DVIC, as well as the many newly emerged groups of organized gang stalkers that I have implicated elsewhere on this blog, and 2) her work in prisons is nearly as inhumane and antithetical to the lived experience of an actual target of organized stalking, Dr. Moss David Posner, who died as a TI while advocating for  prisoners rights.

Then, I would like to point the researcher to the fact that much of Sheridan and James-et al’s work-indeed the entire dialectic of who or what is stalking or stalkers  is also very closely centered on police and police perception management, and “influence:”Are police under the influence of influence operations by pseudo-science and psychology?

And here we see the “conflict” begin:

Is This Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking Behavior Among Young Male and Female Adults in Hong Kong and Mainland China

Heng Choon (Oliver) Chan, PhD, Lorraine Sheridan, PhD

First Published May 29, 2017 Research Article

Download PDF

Article information

Abstract

Most studies of stalking are conducted with samples from individualist cultures. Little is known about the phenomenon within collectivist cultures. The present study is arguably the first stalking study conducted in Hong Kong. Specifically, this study investigates a large sample of Asian college students’ (N = 2,496) perceptions of stalking behavior, potential reasons for stalking, and coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims. Associations between these variables and gender and culture (Hong Kong vs. Mainland China) were also explored. Gender was more strongly associated with perceptions of stalking behavior than was culture. Gender was less strongly associated with perceptions concerning motivations for stalking and the effectiveness of coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims than was culture.

….follow this link to read more

Organized gang stalking makes strange bedfellows- how police are compromised by the “Hegelian dialectic” and “community “policing.”: Or Hegel meets God in the gray area of undue processes of “G-d.”

San Diego Detective Phillip Worts noted in 2001 that “community policing” is in fact and practice, “communist policing.”

GeorgWilhelm Friedrich Hegel, et al versus The Bible, Luke, Mathew, and “divide and conquer”(let me know if you see patterns with these Nazi sounding names-or in cults and sects within policing):

Karl Marx: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways. The point, however, is to change it.”

Luke 12:51 “51Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division” New International Version Bible citation

Mathew 10:35 King James Bible
For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Related Reading: How Hegelian Dialectic destroys individual alterity and thus perpetuates endless war because it wars on individuals, aka “organized gang stalking.”

Policing is literally at a crossroads in western nations, as community policing aka “communist policing” competes with the “G-d model” of policing, with seemingly no middle ground. This is by design of the Hegelian Dialectic, which is a polarizing force in politics, and every other element of our society. So for some “just doin’ mah job,” means getting home in one piece, one day at a time, whereas for others, the goal is constant conflict creation via “community policing,” which is a make-work project, and a Communist model of social control.

So, if there is a problem with police, the FBI, or other agencies that are charged to uphold our secular laws, it is this exact conflict, that hamstrings Christians, while empowering fascists and communists, all of whom are working from within their own version of personal morality “for the greater good” and in our police power institutions. And I have noted that policing is rife with cults, both religious and secular and also some seek to use their police power to proselytize, instead of merely upholding the law.

So- while it may seem odd to some that a secular humanist/atheist/naturist would find myself siding with “God fearing men,” it is not entirely without awareness that each man’s personal faith-and thus individual choices- is challenged by the Hegelian dialectic materialism, which shares features with Martin Buber’s Zionism as well.

The careful reader will note that I have mentioned Israeli control of our SWAT teams, and police chiefs, most of whom think they are working for “God” but who also in fact are duped because they are working for the “othering” power of “Ich, Du” in Buber’s construct, while completely foregoing due process of law, or even respect for the US Constitution, which is the traditional gray area process of law.

Others will note that I am a constant critic of “neverending war.” This state of affairs-wars without end- is as some have noted, designed for that exact purpose, that in the Hegelian dialectic of  constant conflict, there can literally be no solutions, ever. So, this situation of ongoing and forever war, we see, is fully exploited by the DVIC and police chiefs who are faithful not to the Constitution, or to due process rights, but serving another master instead-that of international finance, and the deep trough of capital that flows through it and which carries the price tag of amoral and mercenary policing.

So, here is a snippet from Det. Worts, one of the early canaries in the coal mine of police and free speech rights that foreshadowed our current situation of “time theft” via “gray area policing schemes” that literally use par-judicial kangaroo courts to build data and then use the DVIC, domestic violence courts, family courts, academic hearings, and the many inter-linked and assorted databases for blackmail, and who wage slander campaigns based on dosssiers that have not had the opportunity of refutation in any Constitutional  legal setting; and this which has led to the NSA/CIA/DEA/FBI/local police data theft pipeline:

The home for this new wave of dialectical Marxist thinking became the emerging “science” of socio-psychology. It may come as a surprise to many to discover that virtually all of the pillars of modern psychology were humanistic utopians who believed that there is no God, that mankind can and should be manipulated (for its own good, of course), and that all social problems can be solved by the proper reprogramming of man’s mind. This would lead to an era of peace and prosperity based on diversity, tolerance and unity. Most of their work dealt with the details of human behavior, but their over-arching view was that of transforming society (echo the revolution). Hence, they came to be known as “Transformational Marxists.”

One such group was the Fabian Socialists, who took their name from the Roman general, Fabius. Fabius, it will be remembered, was confronted with Hannibal’s invasion of Italy.