Bombing suspect mentally ill. Deep State cozies up: another #badguy Foiled! Stop me if you start to see patterns. Obsession with patterns can indicate schizophrenia.

Note to the reader: mental health professionals see patterns and obsession with coincidences as signs of mental illness. Tell me if you see a pattern here, with YET ANOTHER MI kid entrapped in a “terrorist plot.”

Attempted bombing suspect’s family issues statement [full story here]

by Kyle Schwab, & Meg Wingerter Published: August 16, 2017 8:57 AM CDT Updated: August 16, 2017 9:02 AM CDT

Family members of Jerry Drake Varnell issued a statement late Tuesday night regarding his involvement in Saturday’s attempted bombing of a downtown Oklahoma City bank building.

“We as a family are extremely distraught about this situation with our son Jerry Drake Varnell, but what the public must understand is that he is a paranoid schizophrenic and is extremely susceptible to different types of ideology that normal people would deem immoral. Underneath his condition, he is a sweet-hearted person and we are extremely shocked that this event has happened. However, what truly has us flabbergasted is the fact that the FBI knew he was schizophrenic. The State of Oklahoma found him mentally incompetent and we, his parents have legal guardianship over him by the Court. These documents are sealed from the public, which is why no news media outlet has been able to obtain them. The FBI clearly knew that he was schizophrenic because they have gathered every ounce of information on him. Reading the criminal complaint against him has brought us great pause due to the numerous lies from the informant. We do not have an underground bunker! We built our home a few years ago and bought a storage container, as we use it for a storm shelter. We only recently pushed dirt up around it to make it safe. The building is used for storage and is NOT a bunker full of food and supplies, in fact the doors close from the outside. It has neither electricity nor anything that would make it habitable.

What the public should be looking at is the fact that the FBI gave our son the means to make this happen. He has no job, no money, no vehicle, and no driver’s license, due to the fact that he is schizophrenic and we; his parents do everything we can possible to keep him safe and functional. The mental health system has consistently failed us due to the lack of establishments and health care coverage for a person like him….

---

 

Some say that delusional disorders include irrational fears of patterns, or an unusual obsession with coincidences. In the story above, we see both ‘patterns,’ and ‘coincidences.’

Here is one such coincidence: the family of yet another entrapped defendant  thinks FBI due process reach-around milked their MI son into a plot. This is a pattern with each and every mentally ill kid that is entrapped into a nebulous FBI plot. And you can BET that many others discussed in my thesis were involved as well. Apparently, someone sat down and said “Gee Bob, do you think there might be more money in fake plots, or in the proper care of schizophrenics?”

The short answer, of course, is that there’s waaaaaaay more money in fake terror plots.

Pattern’s:

Attempted-Bombing Suspect’s Family Is ‘Flabbergasted’ at FBI

Jerry Drake Varnell’s parents says he has schizophrenia—and FBI took advantage

I would LOOOOOOOOVE to see this kids internet history-and trace all of the connections he had(and did not knw he had) to Fusion Centers, squad cars, the Rotary Club, etc-all of those InfraGard goodguys who are “protecting the wimmin and chilren,” from #badguys- and just to see how much of my many thesis could be validated in this one single case alone.

Coincidence’s:

Government agents ‘directly involved’ in most high-profile US terror plots

• Human Rights Watch documents ‘sting’ operations
• Report raises questions about post-9/11 civil rights

 

Alright folks, try not to let all these “pattern’s and coincidences” cloud YOUR patriotic vision-and keep milking that “anti-turrerismsmsmsms” teat til the cow’s come home to roost. And of course, carry on! Nothing to see here! MooooOOOOOooove along now.

But before you get back to that trough over there (the one with the hen house on top, and the fox, there,  guarding the hens safety) take a look at Google search terms like “”gang stalking” and “neighborhood watch” which returns about 37,100 results worth of “coincidences.” It’s starting to look like a “pattern,” similar to how some say that “community clubs” like the Rotary and more are involved. Hmmm.

 

Try not to make yourself crazy in that echo chamber, lol.

lolololooolooooollllllll.

Then there’s this old blog which documented it too: http://neighborhood-watch-gone-bad.blogspot.com/

and some comenntary:

Neighborhood Watch, Neighborhood Support, Community-Based Policing, Community Watch-Dog Groups, Citizen’s Corps, Community Patrol, Crime Watch, Guardian Angels, Citizen Observer, COPS, TIPS…

These and other such ‘citizen safety’ or ‘crime prevention’ groups, which any citizen can join, are a house-hold name. We put our trust in these groups, who declare themselves to be the ‘eyes and ears’ of the state.

COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT CRIMINALS HAVE IN FACT INFILTRATED, STARTED UP, OR HIJACKED MOST NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH-TYPE GROUPS, AND ARE INSTEAD USING THEM AS A FRONT TO VICTIMIZE AN INNOCENT CITIZEN LIKE YOURSELF IN A COORDINATED CAMPAIGN OF TERROR?….Community based policing groups such as neighborhood support are now using neighbor’s to help them to psychologically and socially attack an innocent individual who they have chosen for ‘destruction’.

 

And here is a correlation between an “increase in federal funds for neighbors to wage hidden terror campaigns on other neighbors” and “positive spin” from spin doctors that claims ‘crime goes down’ with community watch groups. Hmmm. I guess that depends upon how you define “crime,” and whether or not you can catch the rat’s at your windowsill.

Here are tools YOU can use to catch these voyeurs, bullies, and internet switch redirectors in action.

 

Organized stalking and punitive psychology: the paradox of psychologists as arbiters of the mental health of targeted individuals.

Conflict of interest in psychology? Targeted individuals and mental health: CVE programs and dubious intentions; even more dubious results.

Those who experience the quasi legal, and often illegal interactions targeted at them by intelligence agencies, law enforcement and the wide net of affiliated community groups that perpetrate organized gang stalking, such as the LEIU’s,  are often left debilitated, as the goals of OGS are stated in multiple blogs and videos online, and even Urban Dictionary is aware of these campaigns: they seek to destroy individuals.

Urban Dictionary has a list of the activities that TI’s are subjected to, but there are many more descriptions in the less than academic online discussion communities. One theme is certain to come up:  OGS seeks to destroy relationships or exploit them, isolate individuals, demolish and demoralize individuals and leave them broken and homeless.

Programs like the FBI’s Countering Violent Extremism, or CVE program,  enlists psychologists, social workers, teachers, homeless shelter advocates, and many more community members in the stalking, and harassment that a targeted individual experiences, and the TI has little to no chance of privacy, or the ability to recuperate from the stated goals of OGS. They literally have nowhere to run as they are filleted by this mechanism.

Let’s take a look at what a TI experiences as they are pressured or recruited by an FBI informant- and keep in mind that it is not just Muslim’s who are being targeted, but also that every law enforcement agency has versions of their own programs, targeting trailer park kids and south Central teenagers in other crime creation or infiltration schemes, as the FBI CVE is just the template for a wider range of community policing programs. And, as noted elsewhere in my blog, religious organizations and cults, community groups and others use these tactics too, though the purposes vary, the effect is often the same.

From the Intercept:

First, they target a Muslim[see my note above]: not due to any evidence of intent or capability to engage in terrorism, but rather for the “radical” political views he expresses. In most cases, the Muslim targeted by the FBI is a very young (late teens, early 20s), adrift, unemployed loner who has shown no signs of mastering basic life functions, let alone carrying out a serious terror attack, and has no known involvement with actual terrorist groups.

They then find another Muslim who is highly motivated to help disrupt a “terror plot”: either because they’re being paid substantial sums of money by the FBI or because (as appears to be the case here) they are charged with some unrelated crime and are desperate to please the FBI in exchange for leniency (or both). The FBI then gives the informant a detailed attack plan, and sometimes even the money and other instruments to carry it out, and the informant then shares all of that with the target. Typically, the informant also induces, lures, cajoles, and persuades the target to agree to carry out the FBI-designed plot. In some instances where the target refuses to go along, they have their informant offer huge cash inducements to the impoverished target.

Once they finally get the target to agree, the FBI swoops in at the last minute, arrests the target, issues a press release praising themselves for disrupting a dangerous attack (which it conceived of, funded, and recruited the operatives for), and the DOJ and federal judges send their target to prison for years or even decades (where they are kept in special GITMO-like units). Subservient U.S. courts uphold the charges by applying such a broad and permissive interpretation of “entrapment” that it could almost never be successfully invoked.

Once again, we should all pause for a moment to thank the brave men and women of the FBI for saving us from their own terror plots.

One can, if one really wishes, debate whether the FBI should be engaging in such behavior. For reasons I and many others have repeatedly argued, these cases are unjust in the extreme: a form of pre-emptory prosecution where vulnerable individuals are targeted and manipulated not for any criminal acts they have committed but rather for the bad political views they have expressed. They end up sending young people to prison for decades for “crimes” which even their sentencing judges acknowledge they never would have seriously considered, let alone committed, in the absence of FBI trickery. It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking this is a justifiable tactic, but I’m certain there are people who believe that. Let’s leave that question to the side for the moment in favor of a different issue.

So, psychologists in the very least are diagnosing shadows if they are unaware of these types of programs, and doing a great dis-service to psychology, and to the narrative or proper care of TI’s.

These programs incentivize psychology to act as informants themselves, and to report to the authorities the state of mind and mental health of an individual who does not even know who the hidden secret people and groups.In other words, psychology is truly “in on it,” as we have never seen before.

Especially troubling is how one of the leading privacy rape advocates in America, Senator Dianne Feinstein(who  benefits from a $600 million in government/military contract), correlated child pornography with terrorism, and used that as a tool whereby she could pry away patient-therapist privilege.Where once targeted persons and others had the protection of patient-psychologist privilege, today, the agencies have stripped even that. and, in one eerie reminder of past CIA and psychiatry collusion, we now see that California psychologists are mandated to report patients who “use” child pornography, when in fact the agencies distribute it, and likely use it in terrorist recruitment programs in classic compromise operations. As Bruce Schneier has noted, it is likely there is more to the story of terrorists and bad guys and child porn, because hiding secret messages in cp is like “smugglers hiding kilos of cocaine in bales of marijuana.”

There is literally nowhere to hide from this form of institutional abuse, and mis-diagnoses brings back the reminders of the Soviet era and Stalin’s punitive psychology. Agency collusion to undermine victims of government abuses is startlingly similar to earlier era’s of experimentation on citizens.And, because this is a ‘cutting edge’ issue, and fairly new to psychology and criminal defense attorney’s, historical perspective is important, as we know from the past the agencies distribute drugs, and even assassinate people. But few historical examples are better than the story of Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Gary Webb, who first revealed the CIA’s drug running in the US in his expose'”Dark Alliance.”

But whatever you, the reader decides, don’t shoot the messenger-or call them crazy.

Related: Academic says that the governments are distributing child pornography and using terrorism as stalking horses to destroy privacy rights.